DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hu, Jiayu" <jiayu.hu@intel.com>
To: "Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>,
	"maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Yang, YvonneX" <yvonnex.yang@intel.com>,
	"Wang, Yinan" <yinan.wang@intel.com>,
	"Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/4] vhost: add support for packed ring in async vhost
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 02:02:48 +0000
Message-ID: <ca2a2909f03f441da2c45a57305c1e14@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414061343.54919-3-Cheng1.jiang@intel.com>

Hi Cheng,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 2:14 PM
> To: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hu, Jiayu <jiayu.hu@intel.com>; Yang, YvonneX
> <yvonnex.yang@intel.com>; Wang, Yinan <yinan.wang@intel.com>; Liu,
> Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>; Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v7 2/4] vhost: add support for packed ring in async vhost
> 
> For now async vhost data path only supports split ring. This patch
> enables packed ring in async vhost data path to make async vhost
> compatible with virtio 1.1 spec.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cheng Jiang <Cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_async.h |   1 +
>  lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c           |  49 ++--
>  lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h           |  15 +-
>  lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c      | 432 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  4 files changed, 456 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_async.h
> b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_async.h
> index c855ff875..6faa31f5a 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_async.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_async.h
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct rte_vhost_async_channel_ops {
>  struct async_inflight_info {
>  	struct rte_mbuf *mbuf;
>  	uint16_t descs; /* num of descs inflight */
> +	uint16_t nr_buffers; /* num of buffers inflight for packed ring */
>  };
> 
>  /**
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c
> index a70fe01d8..f509186c6 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -338,19 +338,22 @@ cleanup_device(struct virtio_net *dev, int destroy)
>  }
> 
>  static void
> -vhost_free_async_mem(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> +vhost_free_async_mem(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>  {
> -	if (vq->async_pkts_info)
> -		rte_free(vq->async_pkts_info);
> -	if (vq->async_descs_split)
> +	rte_free(vq->async_pkts_info);
> +
> +	if (vq_is_packed(dev)) {
> +		rte_free(vq->async_buffers_packed);
> +		vq->async_buffers_packed = NULL;
> +	} else {
>  		rte_free(vq->async_descs_split);
> -	if (vq->it_pool)
> -		rte_free(vq->it_pool);
> -	if (vq->vec_pool)
> -		rte_free(vq->vec_pool);
> +		vq->async_descs_split = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	rte_free(vq->it_pool);
> +	rte_free(vq->vec_pool);
> 
>  	vq->async_pkts_info = NULL;
> -	vq->async_descs_split = NULL;
>  	vq->it_pool = NULL;
>  	vq->vec_pool = NULL;
>  }
> @@ -360,10 +363,10 @@ free_vq(struct virtio_net *dev, struct
> vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>  {
>  	if (vq_is_packed(dev))
>  		rte_free(vq->shadow_used_packed);
> -	else {
> +	else
>  		rte_free(vq->shadow_used_split);
> -		vhost_free_async_mem(vq);
> -	}
> +
> +	vhost_free_async_mem(dev, vq);
>  	rte_free(vq->batch_copy_elems);
>  	if (vq->iotlb_pool)
>  		rte_mempool_free(vq->iotlb_pool);
> @@ -1626,10 +1629,9 @@ int rte_vhost_async_channel_register(int vid,
> uint16_t queue_id,
>  	if (unlikely(vq == NULL || !dev->async_copy))
>  		return -1;
> 
> -	/* packed queue is not supported */
> -	if (unlikely(vq_is_packed(dev) || !f.async_inorder)) {
> +	if (unlikely(!f.async_inorder)) {
>  		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR,
> -			"async copy is not supported on packed queue or
> non-inorder mode "
> +			"async copy is not supported on non-inorder mode "
>  			"(vid %d, qid: %d)\n", vid, queue_id);
>  		return -1;
>  	}
> @@ -1667,12 +1669,19 @@ int rte_vhost_async_channel_register(int vid,
> uint16_t queue_id,
>  	vq->vec_pool = rte_malloc_socket(NULL,
>  			VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_VEC * sizeof(struct iovec),
>  			RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, node);
> -	vq->async_descs_split = rte_malloc_socket(NULL,
> +	if (vq_is_packed(dev)) {
> +		vq->async_buffers_packed = rte_malloc_socket(NULL,
> +			vq->size * sizeof(struct vring_used_elem_packed),
> +			RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, node);
> +	} else {
> +		vq->async_descs_split = rte_malloc_socket(NULL,
>  			vq->size * sizeof(struct vring_used_elem),
>  			RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, node);
> -	if (!vq->async_descs_split || !vq->async_pkts_info ||
> -		!vq->it_pool || !vq->vec_pool) {
> -		vhost_free_async_mem(vq);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!vq->async_buffers_packed || !vq->async_descs_split ||
async_buffers_packed and async_descs_split are two members of a union.
Like the way processed in vhost_free_async_mem(), do you think it's better
to check if they are NULL in if-else respectively?

> +		!vq->async_pkts_info || !vq->it_pool || !vq->vec_pool) {
> +		vhost_free_async_mem(dev, vq);
>  		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR,
>  				"async register failed: cannot allocate
> memory for vq data "
>  				"(vid %d, qid: %d)\n", vid, queue_id);
> @@ -1728,7 +1737,7 @@ int rte_vhost_async_channel_unregister(int vid,
> uint16_t queue_id)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> 
> -	vhost_free_async_mem(vq);
> +	vhost_free_async_mem(dev, vq);
> 
>  	vq->async_ops.transfer_data = NULL;
>  	vq->async_ops.check_completed_copies = NULL;
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> index f628714c2..673335217 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> @@ -201,9 +201,18 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
>  	uint16_t	async_pkts_idx;
>  	uint16_t	async_pkts_inflight_n;
>  	uint16_t	async_last_pkts_n;
> -	struct vring_used_elem  *async_descs_split;
> -	uint16_t async_desc_idx;
> -	uint16_t last_async_desc_idx;
> +	union {
> +		struct vring_used_elem  *async_descs_split;
> +		struct vring_used_elem_packed *async_buffers_packed;
> +	};
> +	union {
> +		uint16_t async_desc_idx;
> +		uint16_t async_packed_buffer_idx;
> +	};
> +	union {
> +		uint16_t last_async_desc_idx;
> +		uint16_t last_async_buffer_idx;
> +	};
> 
>  	/* vq async features */
>  	bool		async_inorder;
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> index 438bdafd1..54e11e3a5 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> @@ -363,14 +363,14 @@
> vhost_shadow_dequeue_single_packed_inorder(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>  }
> 
>  static __rte_always_inline void
> -vhost_shadow_enqueue_single_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
> -				   struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> -				   uint32_t len[],
> -				   uint16_t id[],
> -				   uint16_t count[],
> +vhost_shadow_enqueue_packed(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> +				   uint32_t *len,
> +				   uint16_t *id,
> +				   uint16_t *count,
>  				   uint16_t num_buffers)
>  {
>  	uint16_t i;
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_buffers; i++) {
>  		/* enqueue shadow flush action aligned with batch num */
>  		if (!vq->shadow_used_idx)
> @@ -382,6 +382,17 @@ vhost_shadow_enqueue_single_packed(struct
> virtio_net *dev,
>  		vq->shadow_aligned_idx += count[i];
>  		vq->shadow_used_idx++;
>  	}
> +}
> +
> +static __rte_always_inline void
> +vhost_shadow_enqueue_single_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
> +				   struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> +				   uint32_t *len,
> +				   uint16_t *id,
> +				   uint16_t *count,
> +				   uint16_t num_buffers)
> +{
> +	vhost_shadow_enqueue_packed(vq, len, id, count, num_buffers);
> 
>  	if (vq->shadow_aligned_idx >= PACKED_BATCH_SIZE) {
>  		do_data_copy_enqueue(dev, vq);
> @@ -1474,6 +1485,23 @@ store_dma_desc_info_split(struct
> vring_used_elem *s_ring, struct vring_used_elem
>  	}
>  }
> 
> +static __rte_always_inline void
> +store_dma_desc_info_packed(struct vring_used_elem_packed *s_ring,
> +		struct vring_used_elem_packed *d_ring,
> +		uint16_t ring_size, uint16_t s_idx, uint16_t d_idx, uint16_t
> count)
> +{
> +	uint16_t elem_size = sizeof(struct vring_used_elem_packed);
> +
> +	if (d_idx + count <= ring_size) {
> +		rte_memcpy(d_ring + d_idx, s_ring + s_idx, count *
> elem_size);
> +	} else {
> +		uint16_t size = ring_size - d_idx;
> +
> +		rte_memcpy(d_ring + d_idx, s_ring + s_idx, size * elem_size);
> +		rte_memcpy(d_ring, s_ring + s_idx + size, (count - size) *
> elem_size);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static __rte_noinline uint32_t
>  virtio_dev_rx_async_submit_split(struct virtio_net *dev,
>  	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, uint16_t queue_id,
> @@ -1641,6 +1669,330 @@ virtio_dev_rx_async_submit_split(struct
> virtio_net *dev,
>  	return pkt_idx;
>  }
> 
> +static __rte_always_inline void
> +vhost_update_used_packed(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> +			struct vring_used_elem_packed *shadow_ring,
> +			uint16_t count)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	uint16_t used_idx = vq->last_used_idx;
> +	uint16_t head_idx = vq->last_used_idx;
> +	uint16_t head_flags = 0;
> +
> +	if (count == 0)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* Split loop in two to save memory barriers */
> +	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +		vq->desc_packed[used_idx].id = shadow_ring[i].id;
> +		vq->desc_packed[used_idx].len = shadow_ring[i].len;
> +
> +		used_idx += shadow_ring[i].count;
> +		if (used_idx >= vq->size)
> +			used_idx -= vq->size;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* The ordering for storing desc flags needs to be enforced. */
> +	rte_atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +		uint16_t flags;
> +
> +		if (vq->shadow_used_packed[i].len)
> +			flags = VRING_DESC_F_WRITE;
> +		else
> +			flags = 0;
> +
> +		if (vq->used_wrap_counter) {
> +			flags |= VRING_DESC_F_USED;
> +			flags |= VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL;
> +		} else {
> +			flags &= ~VRING_DESC_F_USED;
> +			flags &= ~VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (i > 0) {
> +			vq->desc_packed[vq->last_used_idx].flags = flags;
> +
No need a blank line above.

> +		} else {
> +			head_idx = vq->last_used_idx;
> +			head_flags = flags;
> +		}
> +
> +		vq_inc_last_used_packed(vq, shadow_ring[i].count);
> +	}
> +
> +	vq->desc_packed[head_idx].flags = head_flags;
> +}
> +
> +static __rte_always_inline int
> +vhost_enqueue_async_single_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
> +			    struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> +			    struct rte_mbuf *pkt,
> +			    struct buf_vector *buf_vec,
> +			    uint16_t *nr_descs,
> +			    uint16_t *nr_buffers,
> +			    struct vring_packed_desc *async_descs,
> +			    struct iovec *src_iovec, struct iovec *dst_iovec,
> +			    struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *src_it,
> +			    struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *dst_it)
> +{
> +	uint16_t nr_vec = 0;
> +	uint16_t avail_idx = vq->last_avail_idx;
> +	uint16_t max_tries, tries = 0;
> +	uint16_t buf_id = 0;
> +	uint32_t len = 0;
> +	uint16_t desc_count = 0;
> +	uint32_t size = pkt->pkt_len + sizeof(struct
> virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf);
> +	uint32_t buffer_len[vq->size];
> +	uint16_t buffer_buf_id[vq->size];
> +	uint16_t buffer_desc_count[vq->size];
> +	*nr_buffers = 0;
> +
> +	if (rxvq_is_mergeable(dev))
> +		max_tries = vq->size - 1;
> +	else
> +		max_tries = 1;
> +
> +	while (size > 0) {
> +		/*
> +		 * if we tried all available ring items, and still
> +		 * can't get enough buf, it means something abnormal
> +		 * happened.
> +		 */
> +		if (unlikely(++tries > max_tries))
> +			return -1;
> +
> +		if (unlikely(fill_vec_buf_packed(dev, vq, avail_idx,
> &desc_count, buf_vec, &nr_vec,
> +						&buf_id, &len,
> VHOST_ACCESS_RW) < 0))
> +			return -1;
> +
> +		len = RTE_MIN(len, size);
> +		size -= len;
> +
> +		buffer_len[*nr_buffers] = len;
> +		buffer_buf_id[*nr_buffers] = buf_id;
> +		buffer_desc_count[*nr_buffers] = desc_count;
> +		*nr_buffers += 1;
> +
> +		*nr_descs += desc_count;
> +		avail_idx += desc_count;
> +		if (avail_idx >= vq->size)
> +			avail_idx -= vq->size;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (async_mbuf_to_desc(dev, vq, pkt, buf_vec, nr_vec, *nr_buffers,
> src_iovec, dst_iovec,
> +			src_it, dst_it) < 0)
> +		return -1;
> +	/* store descriptors for DMA */
> +	if (avail_idx >= *nr_descs) {
> +		rte_memcpy(async_descs, &vq->desc_packed[vq-
> >last_avail_idx],
> +			*nr_descs * sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc));
> +	} else {
> +		uint16_t nr_copy = vq->size - vq->last_avail_idx;
> +		rte_memcpy(async_descs, &vq->desc_packed[vq-
> >last_avail_idx],
> +			nr_copy * sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc));
> +		rte_memcpy(async_descs + nr_copy, vq->desc_packed,
> +			(*nr_descs - nr_copy) * sizeof(struct
> vring_packed_desc));
> +	}
> +
> +	vhost_shadow_enqueue_packed(vq, buffer_len, buffer_buf_id,
> buffer_desc_count, *nr_buffers);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static __rte_always_inline int16_t
> +virtio_dev_rx_async_single_packed(struct virtio_net *dev, struct
> vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> +			    struct rte_mbuf *pkt, uint16_t *nr_descs, uint16_t
> *nr_buffers,
> +			    struct vring_packed_desc *async_descs,
> +			    struct iovec *src_iovec, struct iovec *dst_iovec,
> +			    struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *src_it, struct
> rte_vhost_iov_iter *dst_it)
> +{
> +	struct buf_vector buf_vec[BUF_VECTOR_MAX];
> +	*nr_descs = 0;
> +	*nr_buffers = 0;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(vhost_enqueue_async_single_packed(dev, vq, pkt,
> buf_vec, nr_descs, nr_buffers,
> +						 async_descs, src_iovec,
> dst_iovec,
> +						 src_it, dst_it) < 0)) {
> +		VHOST_LOG_DATA(DEBUG, "(%d) failed to get enough desc
> from vring\n", dev->vid);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	VHOST_LOG_DATA(DEBUG, "(%d) current index %d | end
> index %d\n",
> +			dev->vid, vq->last_avail_idx, vq->last_avail_idx +
> *nr_descs);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static __rte_always_inline void
> +dma_error_handler_packed(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct
> vring_packed_desc *async_descs,
> +			uint16_t async_descs_idx, uint16_t slot_idx, uint32_t
> nr_err,
> +			uint32_t *pkt_idx, uint32_t *num_async_pkts,
> uint32_t *num_done_pkts)
> +{
> +	uint16_t descs_err = 0;
> +	uint16_t buffers_err = 0;
> +	struct async_inflight_info *pkts_info = vq->async_pkts_info;
> +
> +	*num_async_pkts -= nr_err;
> +	*pkt_idx -= nr_err;
> +	/* calculate the sum of buffers and descs of DMA-error packets. */
> +	while (nr_err-- > 0) {
> +		descs_err += pkts_info[slot_idx % vq->size].descs;
I notice there are several parts using "%" to wrap around index, but
existed code uses "& (vq->size - 1)" instead. I think it's better to keep
it consistent.

Thanks,
Jiayu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-15  2:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-17  8:54 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Cheng Jiang
2021-03-22  6:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Cheng Jiang
2021-03-24  9:19   ` Liu, Yong
2021-03-29 12:29     ` Jiang, Cheng1
2021-03-31 14:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Cheng Jiang
2021-04-07  6:26   ` Hu, Jiayu
2021-04-08 12:01     ` Jiang, Cheng1
2021-04-10 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] " Cheng Jiang
2021-04-10 10:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] vhost: abstract and reorganize async split ring code Cheng Jiang
2021-04-10 10:25   ` Cheng Jiang
2021-04-10 10:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] vhost: add support for packed ring in async vhost Cheng Jiang
2021-04-10 10:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] vhost: add batch datapath for async vhost packed ring Cheng Jiang
2021-04-10 10:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] doc: add release note for vhost async " Cheng Jiang
2021-04-12 11:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] add support for packed ring in async vhost Cheng Jiang
2021-04-12 11:34   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] vhost: abstract and reorganize async split ring code Cheng Jiang
2021-04-13  2:44     ` Hu, Jiayu
2021-04-13  3:26       ` Jiang, Cheng1
2021-04-13  7:11     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-13  9:06       ` Jiang, Cheng1
2021-04-12 11:34   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] vhost: add support for packed ring in async vhost Cheng Jiang
2021-04-13  8:36     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-13 11:48       ` Jiang, Cheng1
2021-04-13 13:08         ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-13 13:50           ` Jiang, Cheng1
2021-04-12 11:34   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] vhost: add batch datapath for async vhost packed ring Cheng Jiang
2021-04-12 11:34   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] doc: add release note for vhost async " Cheng Jiang
2021-04-13 14:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] add support for packed ring in async vhost Cheng Jiang
2021-04-13 14:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] vhost: abstract and reorganize async split ring code Cheng Jiang
2021-04-13 14:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] vhost: add support for packed ring in async vhost Cheng Jiang
2021-04-13 14:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] vhost: add batch datapath for async vhost packed ring Cheng Jiang
2021-04-13 14:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] doc: add release note for vhost async " Cheng Jiang
2021-04-14  6:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] add support for packed ring in async vhost Cheng Jiang
2021-04-14  6:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/4] vhost: abstract and reorganize async split ring code Cheng Jiang
2021-04-14 12:24     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-14  6:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/4] vhost: add support for packed ring in async vhost Cheng Jiang
2021-04-14 13:40     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-15  5:42       ` Jiang, Cheng1
2021-04-15  2:02     ` Hu, Jiayu [this message]
2021-04-15  5:54       ` Jiang, Cheng1
2021-04-14  6:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/4] vhost: add batch datapath for async vhost packed ring Cheng Jiang
2021-04-14  6:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/4] doc: add release note for vhost async " Cheng Jiang
2021-04-19  8:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] add support for packed ring in async vhost Cheng Jiang
2021-04-19  8:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/4] vhost: abstract and reorganize async split ring code Cheng Jiang
2021-04-27  1:19     ` Hu, Jiayu
2021-04-19  8:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/4] vhost: add support for packed ring in async vhost Cheng Jiang
2021-04-27  5:16     ` Hu, Jiayu
2021-04-27  6:07       ` Jiang, Cheng1
2021-04-19  8:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/4] vhost: add batch datapath for async vhost packed ring Cheng Jiang
2021-04-19  8:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/4] doc: add release note for vhost async " Cheng Jiang
2021-04-27  8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] add support for packed ring in async vhost Cheng Jiang
2021-04-27  8:03   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/4] vhost: abstract and reorganize async split ring code Cheng Jiang
2021-04-27  8:03   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] vhost: add support for packed ring in async vhost Cheng Jiang
2021-04-29  1:48     ` Hu, Jiayu
2021-04-29  9:50     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-27  8:03   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/4] vhost: add batch datapath for async vhost packed ring Cheng Jiang
2021-04-29  9:57     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-27  8:03   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/4] doc: add release note for vhost async " Cheng Jiang
2021-04-29  9:58     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-05-04 18:38     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-04  8:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] add support for packed ring in async vhost Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ca2a2909f03f441da2c45a57305c1e14@intel.com \
    --to=jiayu.hu@intel.com \
    --cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
    --cc=cheng1.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=yinan.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yvonnex.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git