From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23293465BD; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:25:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A361E400D6; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:25:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shelob.oktetlabs.ru (shelob.oktetlabs.ru [91.220.146.113]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F98D400D5 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:25:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 shelob.oktetlabs.ru 845FC4C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=oktetlabs.ru; s=default; t=1744961144; bh=+GPMVCh5VUUOQnt7JsIImheCP32ii/GN0/e/JNAzgCA=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Td8DrCHBvKN1BhZkDBSVzUUreGexd8xSgaKu+iGLrEfu8NMP0d7yYGTmOrEXpJKKz oTd5c3DjqYG4WT1ipma6hFqS6mNlC+JUyiLlOmcl1j/v7RfSJF9qTgl+7X+/y7R1VB 6/kZtdoq5eIBspdu0fqM5rYufbeodE56n0vqbaI0= Received: from [192.168.38.17] (aros.oktetlabs.ru [192.168.38.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by shelob.oktetlabs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 845FC4C; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:25:44 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:25:44 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/46] common/sfc_efx/base: add efsys option for Medford4 To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Ivan Malov , dev@dpdk.org, Denis Pryazhennikov , Andy Moreton , Pieter Jansen Van Vuuren , Viacheslav Galaktionov References: <20250416140016.36127-1-ivan.malov@arknetworks.am> <20250416140016.36127-3-ivan.malov@arknetworks.am> <0c7ada9e-26ea-4dae-a1ce-39a3be6127c8@oktetlabs.ru> <20250417080734.4d5441eb@hermes.local> Content-Language: en-US From: Andrew Rybchenko Organization: OKTET Labs In-Reply-To: <20250417080734.4d5441eb@hermes.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 4/17/25 18:07, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:08:20 +0300 > Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > >>> #if EFSYS_OPT_ALLOW_UNCONFIGURED_NIC >>> /* Support adapters with missing static config (for factory use only) */ >>> -# if !(EFSYS_OPT_RIVERHEAD || EFSYS_OPT_MEDFORD || EFSYS_OPT_MEDFORD2) >>> -# error "ALLOW_UNCONFIGURED_NIC requires RIVERHEAD or MEDFORD or MEDFORD2" >>> +# if !(EFSYS_OPT_RIVERHEAD || EFSYS_OPT_MEDFORD || EFSYS_OPT_MEDFORD2 || \ >>> + EFSYS_OPT_MEDFORD4) >>> +# error "ALLOW_UNCONFIGURED_NIC requires RIVERHEAD or MEDFORD or MEDFORD2 " \ >>> + "or MEDFORD4" >> >> Typically it is a bad idea to split error message since it complicates grep. >> Please, double-check that base driver code style requires. >> As far as I remember - no. > > Would a static_assert() logic be less complex here? It is a base driver with its own rules and the same code was used in many places (platforms, drivers) before. I don't know what is today. So, I guess static_assert() is not an option here.