DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	DPDK <dev@dpdk.org>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: coding style: use linux kernel style for indentation
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:51:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbcc161b-f1ba-079d-282d-b64f3a12ce7f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160113084959.797beea5@xeon-e3>

On 1/13/2016 4:49 PM, stephen at networkplumber.org (Stephen Hemminger) wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:07:08 +0000
> Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> So, while the two-tab indent may look "a bit weird" it does solve the two issues
>> above. I believe practical benefits should override initial impressions. [It took
>> me a while to get used to also, but now I very much like it as a style.]
> 
> I don't think that deviating from kernel style for this case is justified.

This is very old patch still sitting in patchwork, re-visiting it mainly to be
able to clean the patchwork.

This is a syntax change request and although I have my personal preferences I
would be OK with whatever decided.

Currently there is already a decided syntax, changing it after this point will
cause either mixed usage or a big syntax cleanup patch. I think both are not good.

I am for continue whatever documented in current DPDK coding style doc, hence
NAK from my side.

Thanks,
ferruh

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-13 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-13  7:58 Yuanhan Liu
2016-01-13 15:07 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-01-13 16:49   ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-02-13 12:51     ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2018-02-13 13:12       ` Yuanhan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cbcc161b-f1ba-079d-282d-b64f3a12ce7f@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yliu@fridaylinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).