DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Yang, Zhiyong" <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>,
	"Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
	"Yao, Lei A" <lei.a.yao@intel.com>,
	"maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"Bie, Tiwei" <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	Harry Van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: fix pmd_test_exit function for vdevs
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 17:32:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc9122dd-3866-bb99-9815-b1e1e6461ca9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4367922.LPtKO2KjJs@xps>

On 5/21/2018 11:54 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 19/05/2018 16:19, Thomas Monjalon:
>> 18/05/2018 18:29, Ferruh Yigit:
>>> On 5/18/2018 4:55 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> While this patch also applied I don't understand it.
>>>> Is it mandatory for each PMD to free all its resources in dev_close()?
>>>> Or it should be done by the rte_device remove function?
>>>>
>>>> If the resource cleanup should be done by the remove function I think it
>>>> should be called for all the devices (pci, vdev, etc).
>>>>
>>>> Is there an exit function for EAL to clean rte_eal_init()? If no, looks like we need it...
>>>
>>> Hi Matan,
>>>
>>> I believe there is a gap in resource cleanup.
>>> dev_close() it not for resource cleanup, it should be in PMD remove() functions,
>>> and PMDs have it. The problem is remove path is not called in application exit.
>>>
>>> As far as I know there is no simple API to clean the resources, having it may
>>> help application to do the cleanup.
>>>
>>> I have seen the rte_eal_cleanup() API by Harry, that can be extended to cover
>>> PMD resource cleanup if there is enough motivation for it.
>>
>> Yes, EAL resources should be removed by the function rte_eal_cleanup().
>> And ethdev ports must be removed by rte_eth_dev_close().
> 
> This patch is relying on rte_eth_dev_detach() to remove the EAL device.
> It should be done in rte_eal_cleanup().
> 
> I am concerned that this patch is workarounding a miss in rte_eal_cleanup,
> and takes a different action only for vdev. It is a bad example.

Indeed it does workaround, but it is needed to fix a defect in virtio-user.

And currently rte_eal_cleanup() is not complete, it is not doing any device
related cleanup.

> 
> And the function rte_eth_dev_detach() is fundamentally wrong and should be deprecated:
> 	http://dpdk.org/commit/b05b444d22
> 	http://dpdk.org/commit/b0fb266855
> 	http://dpdk.org/commit/df3e8ad73f
> 
> One more concern: it seems this patch is breaking failsafe use case.
> Note: bonding is managed as an exception in rte_eth_dev_detach().
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-21 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-18  9:59 zhiyong.yang
2018-05-18  4:52 ` Yao, Lei A
2018-05-18 10:18   ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-05-18 10:21     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-18 10:48     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-18 15:55       ` Matan Azrad
2018-05-18 16:29         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-19 14:19           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-21 10:54             ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-21 16:32               ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2018-05-21 16:38                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-22 13:12                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-22 18:38                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-22 19:48                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-23  1:52                         ` Yang, Zhiyong
2018-05-23 11:37                           ` Yang, Zhiyong
2018-05-23 11:58                             ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-21 16:37             ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-21 16:40               ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-21 16:44                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-21 19:12                   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cc9122dd-3866-bb99-9815-b1e1e6461ca9@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=lei.a.yao@intel.com \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=zhiyong.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).