From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
To: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"david.hunt@intel.com" <david.hunt@intel.com>,
"anatoly.burakov@intel.com" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
"sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com" <sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com>,
liuyonglong <liuyonglong@huawei.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] power: use hugepage memory for queue list entry structure
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:12:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cebfbfb33329429a9a7e28ec717f80cf@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <683e3919-ec47-7918-92f5-fc805952ae75@huawei.com>
>
> 在 2025/2/20 17:41, Konstantin Ananyev 写道:
> > Hi
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Kindly ping for review.
> >>
> >>
> >> 在 2024/12/19 15:53, Huisong Li 写道:
> >>> The queue_list_entry structure data is used in rx_callback of io path
> >>> when enable PMD Power Management. However its memory is currently from
> >>> normal heap memory. For better performance, use hugepage memory to
> >>> replace it.
> > Make sense to me.
> > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
> >
> > I suppose it would also help if you can provide some numbers:
> > i.e.: how much exactly it is 'better'?
> > Did you see any changes in throughput/latency numbers, etc.
>
> This patch is just from my knowledge of DPDK.
>
> I don't what is the good way to evaluate the performance of l3fwd-power.
>
> But I did a test for this after you said.
>
> I found that the throughput of using malloc is better than rte_malloc in
> continuous packet flow case.😮
>
> Can you test this patch on your platform?
I did a quick test - didn't see any diff in performance (packet flooding) with/without the patch.
>
> >
> >>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> lib/power/rte_power_pmd_mgmt.c | 10 +++++-----
> >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/lib/power/rte_power_pmd_mgmt.c b/lib/power/rte_power_pmd_mgmt.c
> >>> index a2fff3b765..c7bf57a910 100644
> >>> --- a/lib/power/rte_power_pmd_mgmt.c
> >>> +++ b/lib/power/rte_power_pmd_mgmt.c
> >>> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ queue_list_find(const struct pmd_core_cfg *cfg, const union queue *q)
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static int
> >>> -queue_list_add(struct pmd_core_cfg *cfg, const union queue *q)
> >>> +queue_list_add(struct pmd_core_cfg *cfg, const union queue *q, unsigned int lcore_id)
> >>> {
> >>> struct queue_list_entry *qle;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -105,10 +105,10 @@ queue_list_add(struct pmd_core_cfg *cfg, const union queue *q)
> >>> if (queue_list_find(cfg, q) != NULL)
> >>> return -EEXIST;
> >>>
> >>> - qle = malloc(sizeof(*qle));
> >>> + qle = rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL, sizeof(*qle), RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE,
> >>> + rte_lcore_to_socket_id(lcore_id));
> >>> if (qle == NULL)
> >>> return -ENOMEM;
> >>> - memset(qle, 0, sizeof(*qle));
> >>>
> >>> queue_copy(&qle->queue, q);
> >>> TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&cfg->head, qle, next);
> >>> @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ rte_power_ethdev_pmgmt_queue_enable(unsigned int lcore_id, uint16_t port_id,
> >>> goto end;
> >>> }
> >>> /* add this queue to the list */
> >>> - ret = queue_list_add(lcore_cfg, &qdata);
> >>> + ret = queue_list_add(lcore_cfg, &qdata, lcore_id);
> >>> if (ret < 0) {
> >>> POWER_LOG(DEBUG, "Failed to add queue to list: %s",
> >>> strerror(-ret));
> >>> @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ rte_power_ethdev_pmgmt_queue_disable(unsigned int lcore_id,
> >>> * callbacks can be freed. we're intentionally casting away const-ness.
> >>> */
> >>> rte_free((void *)(uintptr_t)queue_cfg->cb);
> >>> - free(queue_cfg);
> >>> + rte_free(queue_cfg);
> >>>
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-24 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-19 7:53 Huisong Li
2025-02-20 9:01 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-02-20 9:41 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-02-24 9:23 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-02-24 11:12 ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
2025-02-24 12:47 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-02-20 16:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-20 16:39 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-02-20 16:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-20 16:58 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-02-21 11:21 ` Burakov, Anatoly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cebfbfb33329429a9a7e28ec717f80cf@huawei.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).