From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378E4271
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:36:11 +0100 (CET)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23])
 by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 23 Jan 2019 10:36:10 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,512,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="140702434"
Received: from fyigit-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.22])
 ([10.237.221.22])
 by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2019 10:36:07 -0800
To: Andriy Berestovskyy <berestovskyy@gmail.com>,
 Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 "arybchenko@solarflare.com" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
 "hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
 "jerin.jacob@cavium.com" <jerin.jacob@cavium.com>,
 Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
References: <1490288768-8114-1-git-send-email-Andriy.Berestovskyy@cavium.com>
 <abf49e30-6e40-641b-f668-dfd26c9be689@caviumnetworks.com>
 <1719643.qo6JmGv4pL@xps> <7564896.sbN2ypR4X7@xps>
 <DB7PR05MB4426109FDE704ACB66A28D45C36B0@DB7PR05MB4426.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
 <EDBB9816-FD39-4657-BEEC-046C28A2FF70@gmail.com>
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=ferruh.yigit@intel.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=
 mQINBFXZCFABEADCujshBOAaqPZpwShdkzkyGpJ15lmxiSr3jVMqOtQS/sB3FYLT0/d3+bvy
 qbL9YnlbPyRvZfnP3pXiKwkRoR1RJwEo2BOf6hxdzTmLRtGtwWzI9MwrUPj6n/ldiD58VAGQ
 +iR1I/z9UBUN/ZMksElA2D7Jgg7vZ78iKwNnd+vLBD6I61kVrZ45Vjo3r+pPOByUBXOUlxp9
 GWEKKIrJ4eogqkVNSixN16VYK7xR+5OUkBYUO+sE6etSxCr7BahMPKxH+XPlZZjKrxciaWQb
 +dElz3Ab4Opl+ZT/bK2huX+W+NJBEBVzjTkhjSTjcyRdxvS1gwWRuXqAml/sh+KQjPV1PPHF
 YK5LcqLkle+OKTCa82OvUb7cr+ALxATIZXQkgmn+zFT8UzSS3aiBBohg3BtbTIWy51jNlYdy
 ezUZ4UxKSsFuUTPt+JjHQBvF7WKbmNGS3fCid5Iag4tWOfZoqiCNzxApkVugltxoc6rG2TyX
 CmI2rP0mQ0GOsGXA3+3c1MCdQFzdIn/5tLBZyKy4F54UFo35eOX8/g7OaE+xrgY/4bZjpxC1
 1pd66AAtKb3aNXpHvIfkVV6NYloo52H+FUE5ZDPNCGD0/btFGPWmWRmkPybzColTy7fmPaGz
 cBcEEqHK4T0aY4UJmE7Ylvg255Kz7s6wGZe6IR3N0cKNv++O7QARAQABtCVGZXJydWggWWln
 aXQgPGZlcnJ1aC55aWdpdEBpbnRlbC5jb20+iQJVBBMBAgA/AhsDBgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJCgsE
 FgIDAQIeAQIXgBYhBNI2U4dCLsKE45mBx/kz60PfE2EfBQJbughWBQkHwjOGAAoJEPkz60Pf
 E2Eft84QAIbKWqhgqRfoiw/BbXbA1+qm2o4UgkCRQ0yJgt9QsnbpOmPKydHH0ixCliNz1J8e
 mRXCkMini1bTpnzp7spOjQGLeAFkNFz6BMq8YF2mVWbGEDE9WgnAxZdi0eLY7ZQnHbE6AxKL
 SXmpe9INb6z3ztseFt7mqje/W/6DWYIMnH3Yz9KzxujFWDcq8UCAvPkxVQXLTMpauhFgYeEx
 Nub5HbvhxTfUkapLwRQsSd/HbywzqZ3s/bbYMjj5JO3tgMiM9g9HOjv1G2f1dQjHi5YQiTZl
 1eIIqQ3pTic6ROaiZqNmQFXPsoOOFfXF8nN2zg8kl/sSdoXWHhama5hbwwtl1vdaygQYlmdK
 H2ueiFh/UvT3WG3waNv2eZiEbHV8Rk52Xyn2w1G90lV0fYC6Ket1Xjoch7kjwbx793Kz/RfQ
 rmBY8/S4DTGn3oq3dMdQY+b6+7VMUeLMMh2CXYO9ErkOq+qNTD1IY+cBAkXnaDbQfz0zbste
 ZGWH74FAZ9nCpDOqbRTrBL42aMGhfOWEyeA1x7+hl6JZfabBWAuf4nnCXuorKHzBXTrf7u7p
 fXsKQClWRW77PF1VmzrtKNVSytQAmlCWApQIw20AarFipXmVdIjHmJPU611WoyxZPb4JTOxx
 5cv9B+nr/RIB+v5dcStyHCCwO1be7nBDdCgd4F6kTQPLuQINBFfWTL4BEACnNA29e8TarUsB
 L5n6eLZHXcFvVwNLVlirWOClHXf44o2KnN3ww+eBEmKVfEFo9MSuGDNHS8Zw1NiGMYxLIUgd
 U6gGrVVs/VrQWL82pbMk6jCj98N+BXIri+6K1z+AImz7ax7iF1kDgRAnFWU0znWWBgM2mM8Y
 gDjcxfXk4sCKnvf6Gjo08Ey5zmqx7dekAKU2EEp8Q1EJY3jbymLdZWRP4AFFMTS1rGMk0/tt
 v71NBg1GobCcbNfn9chK/jhqxYhAJqq86RdJQkt3/9x1U1Oq0vXCt4JVVHmkxePtUiuWTTt+
 aYlUAsKYZsWvncExvw77x2ArYDmaK0yfjh37wp0lY7DOJHFxoyT8tyWZlLci/VMRG2Ja33xj
 0CN4C1yBg+QDeV3QFxQo42iA/ykdXPUR3ezmsND3XKvVLTC4DNb3V/EZQ7jBj64+bEK0VW4G
 B31VP00ApNQvSoczsIOAKdk97RNbpmPw6q10ILIB+9T1xbnFYzshzGF17oC0/GENIHATx8vZ
 masOZoDiOZQpeneLgnFE9JfzhLTxv6wNZcc/HLXRQVTkDsQr8ERtkAoHCf1E5+b5Yr7pfnE4
 YuhET746o25S53ELUYPIs49qoJsEJL34/oexMfPGyPIlrbufiNyty5jc/1MRwUlhJlJ5IOHy
 ZUa+6CLR7GdImusFkPJUJwARAQABiQI8BBgBAgAmAhsMFiEE0jZTh0IuwoTjmYHH+TPrQ98T
 YR8FAlu6CHAFCQXE7zIACgkQ+TPrQ98TYR9nXxAAqNBgkYNyGuWUuy0GwDQCbu3iiMyH1+D7
 llafPcK4NYy1Z4AYuVwC9nmLaoj+ozdqS3ncRo57ncRsKEJC46nDJJZYZ5LSJVn63Y3NBF86
 lxQAgjj2oyZEwaLKtKbAFsXL43jv1pUGgSvWwYtDwHITXXFQto9rZEuUDRFSx4sg9OR+Q6/6
 LY+nQQ3OdHlBkflzYMPcWgDcvcTAO6yasLEUf7UcYoSWTyMYjLB4QuNlXzTswzGVMssJF/vo
 V8lD1eqqaSUWG3STF6GVLQOr1NLvN5+kUBiEStHFxBpgSCvYY9sNV8FS6N24CAWMBl+10W+D
 2h1yiiP5dOdPcBDYKsgqDD91/sP0WdyMJkwdQJtD49f9f+lYloxHnSAxMleOpyscg1pldw+i
 mPaUY1bmIknLhhkqfMmjywQOXpac5LRMibAAYkcB8v7y3kwELnt8mhqqZy6LUsqcWygNbH/W
 K3GGt5tRpeIXeJ25x8gg5EBQ0Jnvp/IbBYQfPLtXH0Myq2QuAhk/1q2yEIbVjS+7iowEZNyE
 56K63WBJxsJPB2mvmLgn98GqB4G6GufP1ndS0XDti/2K0o8rep9xoY/JDGi0n0L0tk9BHyoP
 Y7kaEpu7UyY3nVdRLe5H1/MnFG8hdJ97WqnPS0buYZlrbTV0nRFL/NI2VABl18vEEXvNQiO+ vM8=
Message-ID: <d05cadfa-0e0c-cdae-be08-c602218a3d41@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:36:07 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EDBB9816-FD39-4657-BEEC-046C28A2FF70@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] ether: use a default for max Rx frame
 size in configure()
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:36:11 -0000

On 5/24/2018 10:20 AM, Andriy Berestovskyy wrote:
> Hi Shahaf,
> 
>> On 23 May 2018, at 07:21, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com> wrote:
>> I think this patch addressing just small issue in a bigger problem.
>> The way I see it all application needs to specify is the max packet size it expects to receive, nothing else(!). 
> 
> [...]
> 
>> IMO The "jumbo_frame" bit can be set by the underlying PMD directly to the device registers given the max_rx_pkt_len configuration. 
> 
> Sure, it can be deducted in PMD if max_rx_pkt_len is greater than the normal frame size.
> 
> The background behind this patch was to fix some examples on some platforms by allowing them to just set the jumbo bit in config and let the DPDK to deduct the optimal jumbo max_rx_pkt_len.
> 
> There was also another patch which fixed those examples, so they first query the max_rx_pkt_len and then pass it with the config:
> http://dpdk.org/commit/5e470a6654
> 
> That patch has been merged, so now we can fix/change the API in any way we decide, there is no urgency anymore.
> 
> Looks like the jumbo bit in config is redundant, but there might be other opinions.

Back to this old issue, the mentioned inconsistency is still exist in the
current code, and this or relevant ones mentioned a few times already.

What would you think about developing an unit test on 19.05 to test these on
ethdev, and ask vendors to run it and fix failures in next releases?
A more TDD approach, first right the test that fails, later fix it.
If there is a support I can start writing it but will require support.


And related issues:
max_rx_pkt_len
DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS
scattered_rx
mtu


These are provided by user as config option, but some drivers updates some of
them, initial question is, are they input only or can be modified by drivers.

Like if user not requested JUMBO_FRAME but provided a large max_rx_pkt_len,
should user get an error or should PMD enable jumbo frame itself?


And another question around 'max_rx_pkt_len' / 'mtu', both are related and
close. 'max_rx_pkt_len' is frame size as far as I can understand, and since we
have capability to set 'mtu', this looks duplicate.
And I assume users are mostly will be interested in 'mtu', for given 'mtu'
driver can calculate 'max_rx_pkt_len' taking other config options into account
affecting frame size.