From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE22A0A0E; Mon, 10 May 2021 18:11:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08882410F8; Mon, 10 May 2021 18:11:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583FF40F35 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 18:11:06 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: kbNswXg59pTr6+4lGjJYx5m/gtsw9nYiUq3A7bmWV4PPp57Lg0qZLFZvivusxnYN0XZxblf2Eq XBSJ3WV50OSg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9980"; a="260492765" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,286,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="260492765" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 May 2021 09:10:59 -0700 IronPort-SDR: nbASBjCQLBU4m9oVeYLg/7QFmu+WM6r/R8RKwRsKKQ/XIZc7RvTN0VzZDxsNwBdjQc9I487dpk jpJBQ6VxVgVg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,287,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="470836453" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.208.203]) ([10.213.208.203]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 May 2021 09:10:53 -0700 To: Gregory Etelson Cc: Raslan Darawsheh , Slava Ovsiienko , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <20210419130204.24348-1-getelson@nvidia.com> <20210506095751.5689-1-getelson@nvidia.com> From: Ferruh Yigit X-User: ferruhy Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 17:10:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net/mlx5: fix tunnel offload private items location X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 5/10/2021 1:29 PM, Gregory Etelson wrote: > Hello Ferruh, > > The patch has failed ci/Intel-compilation test. > (http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-May/193327.html) > I've checked that with Thomas. He confirmed that was a known fault and > should not affect the current patch. > Can we proceed with the patch integration ? > Hi Gregory, Thanks for the new version and additional effort for clarification, agree that CI issue is something else, patch is already assigned to Raslan and we can proceed with his tree. Thanks, ferruh > Thank you. > > Regards, > Gregory > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gregory Etelson >> Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 12:58 >> To: dev@dpdk.org >> Cc: Gregory Etelson ; Matan Azrad >> ; Ori Kam ; Raslan Darawsheh >> ; ferruh.yigit@intel.com; stable@dpdk.org; Slava >> Ovsiienko ; Shahaf Shuler >> >> Subject: [PATCH v4] net/mlx5: fix tunnel offload private items location >> >> Tunnel offload API requires application to query PMD for specific flow items >> and actions. Application uses these PMD specific elements to build flow >> rules according to the tunnel offload model. >> The model does not restrict private elements location in a flow rule, but the >> current MLX5 PMD implementation expects that tunnel offload rule will >> begin with PMD specific elements. >> The patch removes that placement limitation. >> >> Cc: stable@dpdk.org >> >> Fixes: 4ec6360de37d ("net/mlx5: implement tunnel offload") >> >> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson >> Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko >> --- >> v2: Update the patch comment. >> v3: Remove testpmd patch from the series. >> v4: Remove redundant verifications in flow_dv_validate. <...>