From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <i.maximets@samsung.com>
Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com (mailout1.w1.samsung.com
 [210.118.77.11]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C506F1B4D3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  1 Feb 2019 15:27:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from eucas1p1.samsung.com (unknown [182.198.249.206])
 by mailout1.w1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id
 20190201142740euoutp014ad97a1135d3339a06edda531df94e90~-Q7l07hVe1451414514euoutp01I
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  1 Feb 2019 14:27:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout1.w1.samsung.com
 20190201142740euoutp014ad97a1135d3339a06edda531df94e90~-Q7l07hVe1451414514euoutp01I
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samsung.com;
 s=mail20170921; t=1549031260;
 bh=CW4MeLD0O8yevb4ZR+US63TNpitw+sVxcyYgPcXaPGM=;
 h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=CWNyu2F34upVtwyCLoBs1Nf54zI0a9th/k8K1n/+0NSnhghS4rsaCIsc3CNijT8RQ
 URikDn50GB1949Kp+1kAKpJqoWgTUyhcb9Te2+vAqmuIiQ9FAiLO3hR13fSBGG0s8E
 dF+QqgloZJ8NlCbfZtSECo67g7oJ91YzY236iw0Q=
Received: from eusmges1new.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.242]) by
 eucas1p2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id
 20190201142740eucas1p22dc149c86d0bd5bf16e6d7acecb5d298~-Q7lUyDyu1806718067eucas1p2y;
 Fri,  1 Feb 2019 14:27:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from eucas1p1.samsung.com ( [182.198.249.206]) by
 eusmges1new.samsung.com (EUCPMTA) with SMTP id 0D.16.04441.B57545C5; Fri,  1
 Feb 2019 14:27:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from eusmtrp2.samsung.com (unknown [182.198.249.139]) by
 eucas1p1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPA id
 20190201142739eucas1p1eff46b874ee985b7aa2d32b185e837c1~-Q7kS6efn3219932199eucas1p1Z;
 Fri,  1 Feb 2019 14:27:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from eusmgms1.samsung.com (unknown [182.198.249.179]) by
 eusmtrp2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id
 20190201142738eusmtrp250e58912466f3666d8d8f6f94e2fb905~-Q7kES0M-0339503395eusmtrp2L;
 Fri,  1 Feb 2019 14:27:38 +0000 (GMT)
X-AuditID: cbfec7f2-5e3ff70000001159-b3-5c54575b41ec
Received: from eusmtip2.samsung.com ( [203.254.199.222]) by
 eusmgms1.samsung.com (EUCPMTA) with SMTP id 79.3C.04284.A57545C5; Fri,  1
 Feb 2019 14:27:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [106.109.129.180] (unknown [106.109.129.180]) by
 eusmtip2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPA id
 20190201142738eusmtip29030ee1e147de61caad0fda31d747643~-Q7jtZJvn2753027530eusmtip26;
 Fri,  1 Feb 2019 14:27:38 +0000 (GMT)
To: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: tiwei.bie@intel.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com
From: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <d120a32b-a83b-b5ca-c956-0413c5af65f6@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 17:27:37 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190201100348.6730-1-jfreimann@redhat.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprDKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWy7djPc7rR4SExBh+mGFm8+7SdyeJK+092
 i3NrlrJYHOvcw2KxteE/kwOrx68FS1k9Fu95yeTxft9VNo++LasYA1iiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0S
 uDL27JjPVPBJpKJj4yPmBsZGwS5GTg4JAROJndNmMHcxcnEICaxglFj/vJcRwvnCKPG+ax8r
 hPOZUWLZm42sMC23Jz9lg0gsZ5RYOH0CVP9HRomOea/AqoQF7CU+NnUygdgiAmYSy86fAOrg
 4GAWMJY42VQAEmYT0JE4tfoII4jNK2Ansa3tPxuIzSKgIjHr5Q+wVlGBCInDve+gagQlTs58
 wgJicwpYSizpb2UGsZkFxCWavqxkhbDlJba/nQN2j4TAInaJhufLGCGudpGY9PEgE4QtLPHq
 +BZ2CFtG4v/O+VDxeon7LS8ZIZo7GCWmH/oHlbCX2PL6HDvEA5oS63fpQ4QdJVqegMKLA8jm
 k7jxVhDiBj6JSdumM0OEeSU62oQgqlUkfh9czgxhS0ncfPeZfQKj0iwkn81C8s0sJN/MQti7
 gJFlFaN4amlxbnpqsWFearlecWJucWleul5yfu4mRmCaOf3v+KcdjF8vJR1iFOBgVOLh3fAr
 KEaINbGsuDL3EKMEB7OSCO8Kl5AYId6UxMqq1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4zSHCxK4rzVDA+ihQTSE0tS
 s1NTC1KLYLJMHJxSDYw+u+96tsydxrzkR+Yk536Wxc/Tv1uq/zsV1dNWkjgrWerG2e7OpmkH
 uEyfflSrnJp99IZq2Ptt7l9kHhiZb9LnDnX6bT7j3sXEu2+9ryWfOb9KuP319WTzgB2rPuuz
 d19b81SX7dC+bw8dZY8mSn1PuzjjwYm4iOrePklN/60rG717vt26cz5JiaU4I9FQi7moOBEA
 oOV+fi8DAAA=
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrHIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xe7pR4SExBg37dC3efdrOZHGl/Se7
 xbk1S1ksjnXuYbHY2vCfyYHV49eCpawei/e8ZPJ4v+8qm0ffllWMASxRejZF+aUlqQoZ+cUl
 tkrRhhZGeoaWFnpGJpZ6hsbmsVZGpkr6djYpqTmZZalF+nYJehl7dsxnKvgkUtGx8RFzA2Oj
 YBcjJ4eEgInE7clP2boYuTiEBJYySuzc188OkZCS+PHrAiuELSzx51oXVNF7RonGD5uYQRLC
 AvYSH5s6mUBsEQEziWXnTwAVcXAwCxhLnGwqAAkLCVhIfJy7B6ycTUBH4tTqI4wgNq+AncS2
 tv9sIDaLgIrErJc/wMaICkRIfHy6jwmiRlDi5MwnLCA2p4ClxJL+VrA5zALqEn/mXYKyxSWa
 vqxkhbDlJba/ncM8gVFoFpL2WUhaZiFpmYWkZQEjyypGkdTS4tz03GJDveLE3OLSvHS95Pzc
 TYzAuNp27OfmHYyXNgYfYhTgYFTi4d3wKyhGiDWxrLgy9xCjBAezkgjvCpeQGCHelMTKqtSi
 /Pii0pzU4kOMpkDPTWSWEk3OB8Z8Xkm8oamhuYWlobmxubGZhZI473mDyighgfTEktTs1NSC
 1CKYPiYOTqkGRu8zC4q9DUvOHHi98EHoE4PXf2avfX/koZGbcZDV/O3FD/pl3/5iiDluFH2w
 aNbTX1mf77ltdjQVf/x6u6Jxx7fcr/LvdJdP8rrC8u6kWTrDWS+BBc8cLj2cJfLxQ83u4+u2
 i0ic28cqvVcnUVBXov2AqcYZljk2zyfb8nME3kk/Z+b9P2PWilolluKMREMt5qLiRAB2R29J
 wQIAAA==
X-CMS-MailID: 20190201142739eucas1p1eff46b874ee985b7aa2d32b185e837c1
X-Msg-Generator: CA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RootMTR: 20190201142739eucas1p1eff46b874ee985b7aa2d32b185e837c1
X-EPHeader: CA
CMS-TYPE: 201P
X-CMS-RootMailID: 20190201142739eucas1p1eff46b874ee985b7aa2d32b185e837c1
References: <20190201100348.6730-1-jfreimann@redhat.com>
 <CGME20190201142739eucas1p1eff46b874ee985b7aa2d32b185e837c1@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v4] net/virtio: set offload flag for jumbo frames
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 14:27:41 -0000

On 01.02.2019 13:03, Jens Freimann wrote:
> Port configuration fails because offload flags don't match the expected
> value when max-pkt-len is set to a value that should enable receive port
> offloading but doesn't.
> 
> There are two cases to consider:
> 
> 1. VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is set. Then we need to check if the requested
>    max-pkt-len fits into the MTU plus header. If yes we set the
>    offload flag.
> 2. VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is not set. We can set the offload flag.
> 
> Fixes: a4996bd89c42 ("ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>
> ---
> v3->v4:
>  * make use of hw-max_mtu which is calculated during device init. This
>    way we don't have to re-read the mtu from config space again. This
>    is safe because hw->max_mtu is not changed after init.
> 
> v2->v3:
>  * remove unnecessary brackets (Maxime)
>  * fix commit message (David)
> 
> v1->v2:
>  * include virtnet hdr, ethernet header, vlan tag when comparing against
>    max-rx-pkt-len (Maxime)
> 
>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> index 7c4c1df00..4cf91909d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> @@ -2351,6 +2351,16 @@ virtio_dev_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
>  	if ((host_features & tso_mask) == tso_mask)
>  		dev_info->rx_offload_capa |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO;
>  
> +	if (host_features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU)) {
> +		uint32_t ether_hdr_len = ETHER_HDR_LEN + VLAN_TAG_LEN +
> +			hw->vtnet_hdr_size;
> +		if (dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len <=
> +				hw->max_mtu + ether_hdr_len)
> +			dev_info->rx_offload_capa |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME;
> +	} else {
> +		dev_info->rx_offload_capa |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME;
> +	}
> +

As I wrote for v3, hw->max_mtu already calculated taking VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU
into account. If VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is not set, hw->max_mtu is equal to
"VIRTIO_MAX_RX_PKTLEN - ETHER_HDR_LEN - VLAN_TAG_LEN - hw->vtnet_hdr_size".
i.e. "hw->max_mtu + ether_hdr_len" equal to VIRTIO_MAX_RX_PKTLEN which is
larger or equal to rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len.
So, there is no need to check for VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU here. You may just perform
same check for both cases.

This doesn't give any performance or so, but will simplify the code.

>  	dev_info->tx_offload_capa = DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS |
>  				    DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT;
>  	if (host_features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM)) {
>