From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7F31B03F for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:55:18 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jan 2018 08:55:17 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,372,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="10996617" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.48]) ([10.237.220.48]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2018 08:55:16 -0800 To: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon , Shahaf Shuler Cc: Andrew Rybchenko , Ivan Malov References: <1515658359-1041-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> <1515658359-1041-2-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:55:15 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1515658359-1041-2-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] ethdev: add a function to look up Rx offload names X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:55:19 -0000 On 1/11/2018 8:12 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > From: Ivan Malov > > Commonly, drivers converted to the new offload API > may need to log unsupported offloads as a response > to wrong settings. From this perspective, it would > be convenient to have generic functions to look up > offload names. The patch adds such a helper for Rx. > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov > Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko > > Cc: Thomas Monjalon > Cc: Ferruh Yigit > Cc: Shahaf Shuler Hi Thomas, Shahaf, Any comment on ethdev patches?