From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23566FB25 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:26:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2016 02:26:01 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,378,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="1074367895" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.29]) ([10.237.220.29]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2016 02:26:00 -0800 To: Alejandro Lucero References: <1482149104-40805-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> <3dd84942-5c7b-5f3f-2760-a71f97dfcd6a@intel.com> Cc: dev From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:25:59 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: extend speed capabilities advertised X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:26:02 -0000 On 12/19/2016 6:00 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > I forgot one thing: to update the features file with this new one. > > I will wait for your feedback regarding the discussed problem for > sending another version. I think it is good to go, please send updated version. > <...> > > Sorry, confused. Is it like following: > > " > For new FW, there is no problem, it supports the range between > 1G - 50G, > and reports correct current speed. > > With old FW, device still can be set to speed range between 1G - > 50G, > but it doesn't report current speed correct, and DPDK driver reports > back to application as device current speed is 40G, without really > knowing the current speed. > " > > > Yes, that is. Should then I do anything else or the patch is right > for you now? So, this patch is correct. But for the previous patch "net/nfp: report link speed using hardware info", it would be nice to add above information into source as comment and into commit log. If you can, would you mind sending a new version of that patch? Thanks, ferruh > <...>