From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE4A1B0FF; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:31:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56A20308421A; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.112.28] (ovpn-112-28.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.28]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E0C519C7D; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:31:33 +0000 (UTC) To: dev@dpdk.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, jfreimann@redhat.com, David Marchand Cc: stable@dpdk.org References: <20181127105427.11641-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> From: Maxime Coquelin Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:31:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181127105427.11641-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.40]); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio: allocate vrings on device NUMA node X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:31:37 -0000 On 11/27/18 11:54 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > When a guest is spanned on multiple NUMA nodes and > multiple Virtio devices are spanned onto these nodes, > we expect that their ring memory is allocated in the > right memory node. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin > --- > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 12 +++++++----- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > Applied with fix suggested by David. Thanks, Maxime