From: David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: txq_inline_min not set for ConnectX-5 adapters
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 11:17:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d341d71e-8917-c4c3-a0f6-0f7103a294e5@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM4PR05MB32650CFEF32B1CD0E6BD87B8D2D90@AM4PR05MB3265.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
>>> Yes, thank you for the patch, acked.
>>>
>>> The "txq_inline_min" value was not set for ConnectX-5 to 0 as default.
>>> At the TX queue setup time the "txq_inline_min" is checked against
>>> MLX5_ARG_UNSET and default value 0 is set:
>>>
>>> txq_set_params()
>>> ...
>>> inlen_mode = (config->txq_inline_min == MLX5_ARG_UNSET) ?
>>> 0 : (unsigned int)config->txq_inline_min;
>>>
>>> So, there should be no negative backwards. Did you observe any?
>>
>> The gdb session below shows how the value is unchanged after passing
>> through mlx5_set_min_inline on my system without the change.
>
> Yes, mlx5_set_min_inline() does not set txq_inline_min by default.
> So, your patch is OK.
>
> I mean the actual inline_len is set to 0 before actual usage in txq_set_params()
> routine, so not setting config->txq_inline_min to default zero should not cause
> negative backwards.
So that implies the assert to verify that txq_inline_min >= 0 in
mlx5_set_txlimit_params() is unnecessary. Should the patch change and
just remove the assert?
I think the patch is the more logical solution, setting the value at the
source similar to what's done for all other adapters.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-02 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-31 22:41 David Christensen
2019-07-31 22:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-08-01 4:32 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-08-01 18:24 ` David Christensen
2019-08-02 3:48 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-08-02 18:17 ` David Christensen [this message]
2019-08-04 5:34 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-08-04 10:53 ` Raslan Darawsheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d341d71e-8917-c4c3-a0f6-0f7103a294e5@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=viacheslavo@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).