From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19B9A0A0E; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:54:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548354129E; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:53:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esa1.hc4872-11.iphmx.com (esa1.hc4872-11.iphmx.com [23.90.98.109]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A998440147 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:00:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cognyte.com; i=@cognyte.com; q=dns/txt; s=selector3; t=1619600424; x=1651136424; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=vCSNF8TOcyo1v0j7rOdyKukR/q8pn18haxx2JFVNKaI=; b=PY7qigawh0K4rob3VNdXC/q3PHeZi6pZkadq/7FF6BSRJdEN3FbukSKf 53CPo31ANrYujSiT02Gesl2XdsQrL8/ACfBY/MP/fg/LkrSzk2fYxzUPt xH7RvCcAhlkv3c0F+Xbt8kNQgxs0vk4rp3O9Scrs58UnQa6K3H7wqEBcd B6KHDnWWHH6HjsOiOMyPELxUchHxUqHt5m6kbBnn6XpmSNuqDTHrVAdgK +2TpAhAPT987m8F8xyk7FNDbqe1IwUi+9jbfU02bFFu1wSRkP85+zXIXP KbJR77XLgh5MnRRSH809LV4HjOb/hQkb3rz39AI7lS5FraQAUXgu9fKE5 w==; IronPort-SDR: wHcUtv0gA3M/D4CGN7tB1w0WeYqnyrx6w4xnjR5KOShr6Iv8B4RjrjJLt9wSt9Yfi/ib6j1K/E 6yD60Ak0VDK4gnC74Ck8ZCH0mxSFC9RzUx9EtIdvugNrzm4BnL9abMrUz2QFy+Qns2w+snUCSs FszTvzKEofz6cuxQL4VVPzq4q+JVfJwhJmIV6AO9Ngcza5Mt1/m07I6tFw3cKo9dWOyjGpi7Q6 v8yVs2KuvJilvkTHvGIqwAP68MDgTmx+Xkv5f7Pu5rqAkc5tkfzq3ul9g1JWjE1Y8wUm1vWkkH Iv4= Received: from bzq-193.27.92-131.bgp.bezeqint.net (HELO thcwpexch01.cognyte.local) ([193.27.92.131]) by ob1.hc4872-11.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Apr 2021 16:00:23 +0700 Received: from thcwpexch01.cognyte.local (10.21.210.21) by thcwpexch01.cognyte.local (10.21.210.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:00:20 +0300 Received: from thcwpexch01.cognyte.local ([::1]) by thcwpexch01.cognyte.local ([fe80::4082:eac7:3243:326e%6]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:00:20 +0300 From: "Ram, Hila" To: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: NIC stuck issue once running testpmd Thread-Index: Adc8DNJ9YYQEGfLsSqal2bkUgluvFQ== Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 09:00:20 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.21.186.57] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:53:56 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [dpdk-dev] NIC stuck issue once running testpmd X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, Not sure if this is the best way to communicate, please let me know if ther= e's a preferred one. I encountered some NIC stuck issue on both DPDK19.11 and DPDK20.11 with the= following scenario: 1. Bind interfaces 2. Run dpdk testpmd app. 3. Unbind interfaces. 4. Inject specific pcap. 5. Results with stuck NIC. Only server reboot or pci device reset resolv= es it. Without running step2 issue isn't reproduced. Are you aware to such an issue? Thanks, Hila