DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>,
	mtetsuyah@gmail.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] net/null: add empty promiscuous mode functions
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:47:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3fe6816-8a2a-d323-8e1c-c132c10cc77d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b6af628-7101-484b-01db-16272025105f@solarflare.com>

On 10/17/2019 11:37 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 10/16/19 9:07 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 10/16/2019 4:46 PM, Ciara Power wrote:
>>> Adding promiscuous functions prevents sample applications failing when run
>>> on this virtual PMD. The sample applications call promiscuous functions,
>>> and fail if this function call returns an error, which occurs when the
>>> virtual PMD does not support the promiscuous function being called.
>>>
>>> This change will be implemented for all virtual PMDs that currently do not
>>> have existing promiscuous functions. Multicast functions will also be
>>> added for virtual PMDs to prevent sample application breakages here also.
>> +Andrew
>>
>> With the some ethdev APIs returning error code, some sample applications stop
>> working with virtual interfaces,
>>
>> We can,
>> 1- update sample applications to ignore the errors
>> 2- Add dummy dev_ops support to (almost all) virtual PMDs (what this RFC suggests)
>>
>> (1) puts us back to before the ethdev APIs updated status, and this may be wrong
>> for the physical devices case, so I am for this RFC.
>>
>> Only perhaps we can have some common empty function and keep assigning that one
>> to reduce the dummy code, what do you think?
> 
> I don't like the idea to have common empty/dummy functions.
> If virtual PMD behaves in accordance with enabled promiscuous mode,
> it should initialize it properly on init:
>       eth_dev->data->promiscuous = 1;
> If so, if application requires promiscuous mode, attempt to enable will
> do nothing. If application requires non-promiscuous mode, disable will
> fail and it is good.

It is technically correct that we can't disable promiscuous mode in virtual PMDs
but I think mainly we don't really care so it returning error may make the
applications fail/exit unnecessarily with virtual PMDs.

> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c b/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c
>>> index e2ff41a22..b8472a0cf 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c
>>> @@ -441,11 +441,25 @@ eth_mac_address_set(__rte_unused struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>>   	return 0;
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> +static int
>>> +eth_dev_promiscuous_enable(__rte_unused struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int
>>> +eth_dev_promiscuous_disable(__rte_unused struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static const struct eth_dev_ops ops = {
>>>   	.dev_start = eth_dev_start,
>>>   	.dev_stop = eth_dev_stop,
>>>   	.dev_configure = eth_dev_configure,
>>>   	.dev_infos_get = eth_dev_info,
>>> +	.promiscuous_enable = eth_dev_promiscuous_enable,
>>> +	.promiscuous_disable = eth_dev_promiscuous_disable,
>>>   	.rx_queue_setup = eth_rx_queue_setup,
>>>   	.tx_queue_setup = eth_tx_queue_setup,
>>>   	.rx_queue_release = eth_queue_release,
>>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-17 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-16 15:46 Ciara Power
2019-10-16 18:07 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-17 10:37   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-17 10:47     ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2019-10-17 10:51       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-17 11:05         ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-17 13:43           ` Bruce Richardson
2019-10-17 15:33             ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-18  8:18               ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-18  8:30                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-18 10:13               ` Bruce Richardson
2019-10-18 11:38                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-18 11:57                   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-10-18 13:02                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-18 13:12                   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-10-18 13:38                     ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d3fe6816-8a2a-d323-8e1c-c132c10cc77d@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mtetsuyah@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).