DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, david.marchand@redhat.com,
	hernan.vargas@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/12] baseband/acc: add FFT support to VRB2 variant
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 16:36:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5a5770f-7344-8aef-c527-30f4bbfb7b75@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230929163516.3636499-10-nicolas.chautru@intel.com>



On 9/29/23 18:35, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> Support for the FFT the processing specific to the
> VRB2 variant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> index 93add82947..ce4b90d8e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> @@ -903,6 +903,9 @@ vrb_queue_setup(struct rte_bbdev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
>   			ACC_FCW_LD_BLEN : (conf->op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_FFT ?
>   			ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN : ACC_FCW_MLDTS_BLEN))));
>   
> +	if ((q->d->device_variant == VRB2_VARIANT) && (conf->op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_FFT))
> +		fcw_len = ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN_3;
> +
>   	for (desc_idx = 0; desc_idx < d->sw_ring_max_depth; desc_idx++) {
>   		desc = q->ring_addr + desc_idx;
>   		desc->req.word0 = ACC_DMA_DESC_TYPE;
> @@ -1323,6 +1326,24 @@ vrb_dev_info_get(struct rte_bbdev *dev, struct rte_bbdev_driver_info *dev_info)
>   			.num_buffers_soft_out = 0,
>   			}
>   		},
> +		{
> +			.type	= RTE_BBDEV_OP_FFT,
> +			.cap.fft = {
> +				.capability_flags =
> +						RTE_BBDEV_FFT_WINDOWING |
> +						RTE_BBDEV_FFT_CS_ADJUSTMENT |
> +						RTE_BBDEV_FFT_DFT_BYPASS |
> +						RTE_BBDEV_FFT_IDFT_BYPASS |
> +						RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FP16_INPUT |
> +						RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FP16_OUTPUT |
> +						RTE_BBDEV_FFT_POWER_MEAS |
> +						RTE_BBDEV_FFT_WINDOWING_BYPASS,
> +				.num_buffers_src =
> +						1,
> +				.num_buffers_dst =
> +						1,
> +			}
> +		},
>   		RTE_BBDEV_END_OF_CAPABILITIES_LIST()
>   	};
>   
> @@ -3849,6 +3870,47 @@ vrb1_fcw_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op, struct acc_fcw_fft *fcw)
>   		fcw->bypass = 0;
>   }
>   
> +/* Fill in a frame control word for FFT processing. */
> +static inline void
> +vrb2_fcw_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op, struct acc_fcw_fft_3 *fcw)
> +{
> +	fcw->in_frame_size = op->fft.input_sequence_size;
> +	fcw->leading_pad_size = op->fft.input_leading_padding;
> +	fcw->out_frame_size = op->fft.output_sequence_size;
> +	fcw->leading_depad_size = op->fft.output_leading_depadding;
> +	fcw->cs_window_sel = op->fft.window_index[0] +
> +			(op->fft.window_index[1] << 8) +
> +			(op->fft.window_index[2] << 16) +
> +			(op->fft.window_index[3] << 24);
> +	fcw->cs_window_sel2 = op->fft.window_index[4] +
> +			(op->fft.window_index[5] << 8);
> +	fcw->cs_enable_bmap = op->fft.cs_bitmap;
> +	fcw->num_antennas = op->fft.num_antennas_log2;
> +	fcw->idft_size = op->fft.idft_log2;
> +	fcw->dft_size = op->fft.dft_log2;
> +	fcw->cs_offset = op->fft.cs_time_adjustment;
> +	fcw->idft_shift = op->fft.idft_shift;
> +	fcw->dft_shift = op->fft.dft_shift;
> +	fcw->cs_multiplier = op->fft.ncs_reciprocal;
> +	fcw->power_shift = op->fft.power_shift; > +	fcw->exp_adj = op->fft.fp16_exp_adjust;
> +	fcw->fp16_in = check_bit(op->fft.op_flags, RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FP16_INPUT);
> +	fcw->fp16_out = check_bit(op->fft.op_flags, RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FP16_OUTPUT);
> +	fcw->power_en = check_bit(op->fft.op_flags, RTE_BBDEV_FFT_POWER_MEAS);
> +	if (check_bit(op->fft.op_flags,
> +			RTE_BBDEV_FFT_IDFT_BYPASS)) {
> +		if (check_bit(op->fft.op_flags,
> +				RTE_BBDEV_FFT_WINDOWING_BYPASS))
> +			fcw->bypass = 2;
> +		else
> +			fcw->bypass = 1;
> +	} else if (check_bit(op->fft.op_flags,
> +			RTE_BBDEV_FFT_DFT_BYPASS))
> +		fcw->bypass = 3;
> +	else
> +		fcw->bypass = 0;

The only difference I see with VRB1 are backed by corresponding op_flags
(POWER & FP16), is that correct? If so, it does not make sense to me to
have a specific fucntion for VRB2.

> +}
> +
>   static inline int
>   vrb1_dma_desc_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op,
>   		struct acc_dma_req_desc *desc,
> @@ -3882,6 +3944,58 @@ vrb1_dma_desc_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static inline int
> +vrb2_dma_desc_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op,
> +		struct acc_dma_req_desc *desc,
> +		struct rte_mbuf *input, struct rte_mbuf *output, struct rte_mbuf *win_input,
> +		struct rte_mbuf *pwr, uint32_t *in_offset, uint32_t *out_offset,
> +		uint32_t *win_offset, uint32_t *pwr_offset)
> +{
> +	bool pwr_en = check_bit(op->fft.op_flags, RTE_BBDEV_FFT_POWER_MEAS);
> +	bool win_en = check_bit(op->fft.op_flags, RTE_BBDEV_FFT_DEWINDOWING);
> +	int num_cs = 0, i, bd_idx = 1;
> +
> +	/* FCW already done */
> +	acc_header_init(desc);
> +
> +	RTE_SET_USED(win_input);
> +	RTE_SET_USED(win_offset);
> +
> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].address = rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(input, *in_offset);
> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blen = op->fft.input_sequence_size * ACC_IQ_SIZE;
> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blkid = ACC_DMA_BLKID_IN;
> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].last = 1;
> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].dma_ext = 0;
> +	bd_idx++;
> +
> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].address = rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(output, *out_offset);
> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blen = op->fft.output_sequence_size * ACC_IQ_SIZE;
> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blkid = ACC_DMA_BLKID_OUT_HARD;
> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].last = pwr_en ? 0 : 1;
> +	desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].dma_ext = 0;
> +	desc->m2dlen = win_en ? 3 : 2;
> +	desc->d2mlen = pwr_en ? 2 : 1;
> +	desc->ib_ant_offset = op->fft.input_sequence_size;
> +	desc->num_ant = op->fft.num_antennas_log2 - 3;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_BBDEV_MAX_CS; i++)
> +		if (check_bit(op->fft.cs_bitmap, 1 << i))
> +			num_cs++;
> +	desc->num_cs = num_cs;
> +
> +	if (pwr_en && pwr) {
> +		bd_idx++;
> +		desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].address = rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(pwr, *pwr_offset);
> +		desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blen = num_cs * (1 << op->fft.num_antennas_log2) * 4;
> +		desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blkid = ACC_DMA_BLKID_OUT_SOFT;
> +		desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].last = 1;
> +		desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].dma_ext = 0;
> +	}
> +	desc->ob_cyc_offset = op->fft.output_sequence_size;
> +	desc->ob_ant_offset = op->fft.output_sequence_size * num_cs;
> +	desc->op_addr = op;
> +	return 0;
> +}
>   
>   /** Enqueue one FFT operation for device. */
>   static inline int
> @@ -3889,22 +4003,32 @@ vrb_enqueue_fft_one_op(struct acc_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op,
>   		uint16_t total_enqueued_cbs)
>   {
>   	union acc_dma_desc *desc;
> -	struct rte_mbuf *input, *output;
> -	uint32_t in_offset, out_offset;
> +	struct rte_mbuf *input, *output, *pwr, *win;
> +	uint32_t in_offset, out_offset, pwr_offset, win_offset;
>   	struct acc_fcw_fft *fcw;
>   
>   	desc = acc_desc(q, total_enqueued_cbs);
>   	input = op->fft.base_input.data;
>   	output = op->fft.base_output.data;
> +	pwr = op->fft.power_meas_output.data;
> +	win = op->fft.dewindowing_input.data;
>   	in_offset = op->fft.base_input.offset;
>   	out_offset = op->fft.base_output.offset;
> +	pwr_offset = op->fft.power_meas_output.offset;
> +	win_offset = op->fft.dewindowing_input.offset;
>   
>   	fcw = (struct acc_fcw_fft *) (q->fcw_ring +
>   			((q->sw_ring_head + total_enqueued_cbs) & q->sw_ring_wrap_mask)
>   			* ACC_MAX_FCW_SIZE);
>   
> -	vrb1_fcw_fft_fill(op, fcw);
> -	vrb1_dma_desc_fft_fill(op, &desc->req, input, output, &in_offset, &out_offset);
> +	if (q->d->device_variant == VRB1_VARIANT) {
> +		vrb1_fcw_fft_fill(op, fcw);
> +		vrb1_dma_desc_fft_fill(op, &desc->req, input, output, &in_offset, &out_offset);
> +	} else {
> +		vrb2_fcw_fft_fill(op, (struct acc_fcw_fft_3 *) fcw);
> +		vrb2_dma_desc_fft_fill(op, &desc->req, input, output, win, pwr,
> +				&in_offset, &out_offset, &win_offset, &pwr_offset);
> +	}
>   #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
>   	rte_memdump(stderr, "FCW", &desc->req.fcw_fft,
>   			sizeof(desc->req.fcw_fft));


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-03 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-29 16:35 [PATCH v3 00/12] VRB2 bbdev PMD introduction Nicolas Chautru
2023-09-29 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] bbdev: add FFT window width member in driver info Nicolas Chautru
2023-09-29 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] baseband/acc: add FFT window width in the VRB PMD Nicolas Chautru
2023-10-03 11:52   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-10-03 19:06     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-10-04  7:55       ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-09-29 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] baseband/acc: remove the 4G SO capability for VRB1 Nicolas Chautru
2023-10-03 12:04   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-09-29 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] baseband/acc: allocate FCW memory separately Nicolas Chautru
2023-10-03 12:51   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-09-29 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] baseband/acc: add support for MLD operation Nicolas Chautru
2023-09-29 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] baseband/acc: refactor to allow unified driver extension Nicolas Chautru
2023-10-03 13:14   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-10-03 18:54     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-10-04  7:35       ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-10-04 21:28         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-10-05 14:31           ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-10-05 15:00             ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-09-29 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] baseband/acc: adding VRB2 device variant Nicolas Chautru
2023-10-03 13:41   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-09-29 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] baseband/acc: add FEC capabilities for the VRB2 variant Nicolas Chautru
2023-10-03 14:28   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-10-04 21:11     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-10-05 14:36       ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-09-29 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] baseband/acc: add FFT support to " Nicolas Chautru
2023-10-03 14:36   ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2023-10-03 18:20     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-10-04  7:11       ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-10-04 21:18         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-10-05 14:34           ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-10-05 17:59             ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-10-06 12:05               ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-10-06 20:25                 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-09-29 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] baseband/acc: add MLD support in " Nicolas Chautru
2023-10-03 15:12   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-10-03 18:12     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-09-29 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] baseband/acc: add support for VRB2 engine error detection Nicolas Chautru
2023-10-03 15:16   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-10-03 17:22     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-10-03 17:26       ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-09-29 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] baseband/acc: add configure helper for VRB2 Nicolas Chautru
2023-10-03 15:30   ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d5a5770f-7344-8aef-c527-30f4bbfb7b75@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=hernan.vargas@intel.com \
    --cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).