DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: "Vargas, Hernan" <hernan.vargas@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"gakhil@marvell.com" <gakhil@marvell.com>,
	"Rix, Tom" <trix@redhat.com>
Cc: "Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/13] test/bbdev: add support for BLER for 4G
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:26:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d717d460-5b61-8805-4371-fa76bffb6cc0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB3660CDAC254191874735EE09EFAA9@DM6PR11MB3660.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Hernan,

On 2/22/23 22:55, Vargas, Hernan wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 9:44 AM
>> To: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
>> gakhil@marvell.com; Rix, Tom <trix@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
>> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/13] test/bbdev: add support for BLER for 4G
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/13/23 21:59, Vargas, Hernan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2023 4:20 AM
>>>> To: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
>>>> gakhil@marvell.com; Rix, Tom <trix@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
>>>> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/13] test/bbdev: add support for BLER for 4G
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/17/23 17:50, Hernan Vargas wrote:
>>>>> New feature to add BLER support for 4G in bbdev-test.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 184
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>     1 file changed, 183 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
>>>>> b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
>>>>> index ffb2de0604..69b86cdeb1 100644
>>>>> --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
>>>>> +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
>>>>> @@ -1756,6 +1756,30 @@ gen_qm2_llr(int8_t *llrs, uint32_t j, double
>>>>> N0,
>>>> double llr_max)
>>>>>     	llrs[j] = (int8_t) b;
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>> +/* Simple LLR generation assuming AWGN and QPSK */ static void
>>>>> +gen_turbo_llr(int8_t *llrs, uint32_t j, double N0, double llr_max) {
>>>>> +	double b, b1, n;
>>>>> +	double coeff = 2.0 * sqrt(N0);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/* Ignore in vectors null LLRs not to be saturated */
>>>>> +	if (llrs[j] == 0)
>>>>> +		return;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/* Note don't change sign here */
>>>>> +	n = randn(j % 2);
>>>>> +	b1 = ((llrs[j] > 0 ? 2.0 : -2.0)
>>>>> +			+ coeff * n) / N0;
>>>>> +	b = b1 * (1 << 4);
>>>>> +	b = round(b);
>>>>> +	if (b > llr_max)
>>>>> +		b = llr_max;
>>>>> +	if (b < -llr_max)
>>>>> +		b = -llr_max;
>>>>> +	llrs[j] = (int8_t) b;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>>     /* Generate LLR for a given SNR */
>>>>>     static void
>>>>>     generate_llr_input(uint16_t n, struct rte_bbdev_op_data *inputs,
>>>>> @@
>>>>> -1791,6 +1815,27 @@ generate_llr_input(uint16_t n, struct
>>>> rte_bbdev_op_data *inputs,
>>>>>     	}
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>> +/* Generate LLR for turbo decoder for a given SNR */ static void
>>>>> +generate_turbo_llr_input(uint16_t n, struct rte_bbdev_op_data
>> *inputs,
>>>>> +		struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ref_op)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +	struct rte_mbuf *m;
>>>>> +	uint32_t i, j, range;
>>>>> +	double N0, llr_max;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	llr_max = 127;
>>>>> +	range = ref_op->turbo_dec.input.length;
>>>>> +	N0 = 1.0 / pow(10.0, get_snr() / 10.0);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
>>>>> +		m = inputs[i].data;
>>>>> +		int8_t *llrs = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m, int8_t *, 0);
>>>>> +		for (j = 0; j < range; ++j)
>>>>> +			gen_turbo_llr(llrs, j, N0, llr_max);
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>>     static void
>>>>>     copy_reference_ldpc_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops,
>>>>> unsigned
>>>> int n,
>>>>>     		unsigned int start_idx,
>>>>> @@ -2301,6 +2346,31 @@ validate_ldpc_bler(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op
>>>> **ops, const uint16_t n)
>>>>>     	return errors;
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>> +/* Check Number of code blocks errors */ static int
>>>>> +validate_turbo_bler(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, const uint16_t
>>>>> +n) {
>>>>> +	unsigned int i;
>>>>> +	struct op_data_entries *hard_data_orig =
>>>>> +			&test_vector.entries[DATA_HARD_OUTPUT];
>>>>> +	struct rte_bbdev_op_turbo_dec *ops_td;
>>>>> +	struct rte_bbdev_op_data *hard_output;
>>>>> +	int errors = 0;
>>>>> +	struct rte_mbuf *m;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
>>>>> +		ops_td = &ops[i]->turbo_dec;
>>>>> +		hard_output = &ops_td->hard_output;
>>>>> +		m = hard_output->data;
>>>>> +		if (memcmp(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m, uint32_t *, 0),
>>>>> +				hard_data_orig->segments[0].addr,
>>>>> +				hard_data_orig->segments[0].length))
>>>>
>>>> No need to check mbuf is at least as large as segment 0 length?
>>>>
>>>>> +			errors++;
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +	return errors;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +
>>>>>     static int
>>>>>     validate_ldpc_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, const uint16_t
>> n,
>>>>>     		struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ref_op, const int vector_mask)
>>>> @@ -3736,6
>>>>> +3806,114 @@ bler_pmd_lcore_ldpc_dec(void *arg)
>>>>>     	return TEST_SUCCESS;
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int
>>>>> +bler_pmd_lcore_turbo_dec(void *arg) {
>>>>> +	struct thread_params *tp = arg;
>>>>> +	uint16_t enq, deq;
>>>>> +	uint64_t total_time = 0, start_time;
>>>>> +	const uint16_t queue_id = tp->queue_id;
>>>>> +	const uint16_t burst_sz = tp->op_params->burst_sz;
>>>>> +	const uint16_t num_ops = tp->op_params->num_to_process;
>>>>> +	struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ops_enq[num_ops];
>>>>> +	struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ops_deq[num_ops];
>>>>> +	struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ref_op = tp->op_params->ref_dec_op;
>>>>> +	struct test_buffers *bufs = NULL;
>>>>> +	int i, j, ret;
>>>>> +	struct rte_bbdev_info info;
>>>>> +	uint16_t num_to_enq;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS((burst_sz > MAX_BURST),
>>>>> +			"BURST_SIZE should be <= %u", MAX_BURST);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	rte_bbdev_info_get(tp->dev_id, &info);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS((num_ops > info.drv.queue_size_lim),
>>>>> +			"NUM_OPS cannot exceed %u for this device",
>>>>> +			info.drv.queue_size_lim);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	bufs = &tp->op_params-
>>>>> q_bufs[GET_SOCKET(info.socket_id)][queue_id];
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	rte_wait_until_equal_16(&tp->op_params->sync, SYNC_START,
>>>>> +__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	ret = rte_bbdev_dec_op_alloc_bulk(tp->op_params->mp, ops_enq,
>>>> num_ops);
>>>>> +	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Allocation failed for %d ops",
>>>> num_ops);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/* For BLER tests we need to enable early termination */
>>>>> +	if (!check_bit(ref_op->turbo_dec.op_flags,
>>>>> +			RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_EARLY_TERMINATION))
>>>>> +		ref_op->turbo_dec.op_flags +=
>>>>> +				RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_EARLY_TERMINATION;
>>>>> +	ref_op->turbo_dec.iter_max = get_iter_max();
>>>>> +	ref_op->turbo_dec.iter_count = ref_op->turbo_dec.iter_max;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	if (test_vector.op_type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE)
>>>>> +		copy_reference_dec_op(ops_enq, num_ops, 0, bufs-
>>>>> inputs,
>>>>> +				bufs->hard_outputs, bufs->soft_outputs,
>>>>> +				ref_op);
>>>>> +	generate_turbo_llr_input(num_ops, bufs->inputs, ref_op);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/* Set counter to validate the ordering */
>>>>> +	for (j = 0; j < num_ops; ++j)
>>>>> +		ops_enq[j]->opaque_data = (void *)(uintptr_t)j;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	for (i = 0; i < 1; ++i) { /* Could add more iterations */
>>>>> +		for (j = 0; j < num_ops; ++j) {
>>>>> +			mbuf_reset(
>>>>> +			ops_enq[j]->turbo_dec.hard_output.data);
>>>>> +		}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +		start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise();
>>>>> +
>>>>> +		for (enq = 0, deq = 0; enq < num_ops;) {
>>>>> +			num_to_enq = burst_sz;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +			if (unlikely(num_ops - enq < num_to_enq))
>>>>> +				num_to_enq = num_ops - enq;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +			enq += rte_bbdev_enqueue_dec_ops(tp->dev_id,
>>>>> +					queue_id, &ops_enq[enq],
>>>> num_to_enq);
>>>>
>>>> If for some reason the operation fails (looks like it can fail in at
>>>> least ACC200 I checked), it ends up doing an endless loop as enc won't get
>> incremented.
>>> The python wrapper script used to invoke test-bbdev has a configurable
>> timeout (default 600 seconds) that would stop the test in case it ends up in
>> an infinite loop.
>>
>> Ok, but having a timeout in the test script does not prevent to do a proprer
>> error propagation/handling in the application.
>>
>> It is happens in when running in a CI, having errors properly checked would
>> provide useful information to investigate without having to reproduce, or
>> when failing to reproduce.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Maxime
>>
> This is a good point for future improvement but not related to this series.
> We can implement it in the future. What do you think?

This patch is introducing a new feature, there is a bug in this exact
feature. So this should be fixed in this patch, not in a future release.

Thanks,
Maxime

> Thanks,
> Hernan
>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +			deq += rte_bbdev_dequeue_dec_ops(tp->dev_id,
>>>>> +					queue_id, &ops_deq[deq], enq -
>>>> deq);
>>>>> +		}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +		/* dequeue the remaining */
>>>>> +		while (deq < enq) {
>>>>> +			deq += rte_bbdev_dequeue_dec_ops(tp->dev_id,
>>>>> +					queue_id, &ops_deq[deq], enq -
>>>> deq);
>>>>> +		}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +		total_time += rte_rdtsc_precise() - start_time;
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	tp->iter_count = 0;
>>>>> +	tp->iter_average = 0;
>>>>> +	/* get the max of iter_count for all dequeued ops */
>>>>> +	for (i = 0; i < num_ops; ++i) {
>>>>> +		tp->iter_count = RTE_MAX(ops_enq[i]-
>>>>> turbo_dec.iter_count,
>>>>> +				tp->iter_count);
>>>>> +		tp->iter_average += (double) ops_enq[i]-
>>>>> turbo_dec.iter_count;
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	tp->iter_average /= num_ops;
>>>>> +	tp->bler = (double) validate_turbo_bler(ops_deq, num_ops) /
>>>> num_ops;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	rte_bbdev_dec_op_free_bulk(ops_enq, num_ops);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	double tb_len_bits = calc_dec_TB_size(ref_op);
>>>>> +	tp->ops_per_sec = ((double)num_ops * 1) /
>>>>> +			((double)total_time / (double)rte_get_tsc_hz());
>>>>> +	tp->mbps = (((double)(num_ops * 1 * tb_len_bits)) /
>>>>> +			1000000.0) / ((double)total_time /
>>>>> +			(double)rte_get_tsc_hz());
>>>>> +	printf("TBS %.0f Time %.0f\n", tb_len_bits, 1000000.0 *
>>>>> +			((double)total_time / (double)rte_get_tsc_hz()));
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	return TEST_SUCCESS;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>>     static int
>>>>>     throughput_pmd_lcore_ldpc_dec(void *arg)
>>>>>     {
>>>>> @@ -4193,7 +4371,7 @@ print_dec_bler(struct thread_params
>> *t_params,
>>>> unsigned int used_cores)
>>>>>     	total_bler /= used_cores;
>>>>>     	total_iter /= used_cores;
>>>>>
>>>>> -	printf("SNR %.2f BLER %.1f %% - Iterations %.1f %d - Tp %.1f Mbps
>>>> %s\n",
>>>>> +	printf("SNR %.2f BLER %.1f %% - Iterations %.1f %d - Tp %.3f Mbps
>>>>> +%s\n",
>>>>>     			snr, total_bler * 100, total_iter, get_iter_max(),
>>>>>     			total_mbps, get_vector_filename());
>>>>>     }
>>>>> @@ -4245,6 +4423,10 @@ bler_test(struct active_device *ad,
>>>>>     			&& !check_bit(test_vector.ldpc_dec.op_flags,
>>>>>     			RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_LLR_COMPRESSION))
>>>>>     		bler_function = bler_pmd_lcore_ldpc_dec;
>>>>> +	else if ((test_vector.op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC) &&
>>>>> +			!check_bit(test_vector.turbo_dec.op_flags,
>>>>> +			RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_SOFT_OUTPUT))
>>>>> +		bler_function = bler_pmd_lcore_turbo_dec;
>>>>>     	else
>>>>>     		return TEST_SKIPPED;
>>>>>
>>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-23  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-17 16:50 [PATCH v1 00/13] test/bbdev: changes for 23.03 Hernan Vargas
2023-01-17 16:50 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] test/bbdev: fix seg fault for non supported HARQ len Hernan Vargas
2023-01-31  9:20   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-17 16:50 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] test/bbdev: refactor TB throughput report Hernan Vargas
2023-01-31  9:48   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-17 16:50 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] test/bbdev: add timeout for latency tests Hernan Vargas
2023-01-31 10:02   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-17 16:50 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] test/bbdev: early termination not explicit set Hernan Vargas
2023-01-31 10:04   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-10 17:15     ` Vargas, Hernan
2023-02-20 15:38       ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-17 16:50 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] test/bbdev: report device status in bbdev-test Hernan Vargas
2023-01-31 10:05   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-17 16:50 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] test/bbdev: log capture from queue stop Hernan Vargas
2023-01-31 10:07   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-17 16:50 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] test/bbdev: add support for BLER for 4G Hernan Vargas
2023-01-31 10:20   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-13 20:59     ` Vargas, Hernan
2023-02-20 15:43       ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-22 21:55         ` Vargas, Hernan
2023-02-23  8:26           ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2023-01-17 16:50 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] test/bbdev: extend support for large TB Hernan Vargas
2023-01-31 11:29   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-13 20:20     ` Vargas, Hernan
2023-02-20 15:40       ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-17 16:50 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] test/bbdev: bbdev-test cannot compare some scenarios Hernan Vargas
2023-01-31 12:15   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-13 19:40     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-01-17 16:50 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] test/bbdev: adjustment for soft output Hernan Vargas
2023-01-31 12:25   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-17 16:50 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] test/bbdev: expose warning counters Hernan Vargas
2023-01-31 12:26   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-17 16:50 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] test/bbdev: remove check for invalid opaque data Hernan Vargas
2023-01-31 12:33   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-01-17 16:50 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] test/bbdev: remove iteration count check Hernan Vargas
2023-01-31 12:35   ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-08 20:38     ` Vargas, Hernan
2023-02-09  9:10       ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-09 16:59         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-02-10 14:01           ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-10 18:11             ` Chautru, Nicolas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d717d460-5b61-8805-4371-fa76bffb6cc0@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=hernan.vargas@intel.com \
    --cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).