DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "techboard@dpdk.org" <techboard@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Minutes of Technical Board Meeting, 2020-11-04
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 09:49:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d87fdbe5-6725-1e30-9b32-af62f8c51b10@redhat.com> (raw)

Minutes of Technical Board Meeting, 2020-11-04

Members Attending
-----------------
-Bruce
-Ferruh
-Hemant
-Honnappa
-Jerin
-Kevin (Chair)
-Konstantin
-Maxime
-Olivier
-Stephen
-Thomas

NOTE: The technical board meetings every second Wednesday in
https://meet.jit.si/DPDK at 3 pm UTC.
Meetings are public, and DPDK community members  are welcome to attend.

NOTE: Next meeting will be on Wednesday 2020-11-18 @3pm UTC, and will be
chaired by Konstantin.


Minimum meson version
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Honnappa will check details of which min version is requested/needed
- No decision at present

mbuf: move pool pointer into hotter first half
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Some free space in first cacheline/hotter cache
- Discussed what if anything to put there
- Option 1: enable API to allow request dynamic field to be there
- Option 2: move pool ptr or next ptr there
- Option 3: Mark as reserved in 20.11
- Decided that some optimization may be done over the next year so
better not to do Option 1 as it may be deprecated soon which is
confusing for users
- Decided to move pool ptr to first half of cacheline

BCM573xx and BCM5740xx deprecation
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Hardware support is being deprecated by the vendor
- Raised for awareness

pmdinfogen rewrite
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Maxime checked and this is ok on RHEL/CentOS
- Prefer to make this BSD licensed
- Deferred until 21.02

Deprecation notice without proper replacement
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Is it ok to deprecate without a proper replacement?
- No for marking API as deprecated (may impact build warnings)
- Yes for documentation/comments

Asia Event CFP
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Thomas will send around the previous CFP
- All to review and update

Asks from Governing board
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Ferruh is new rep to Gov board, thanks Bruce
- Slidedeck needs updates

Update on DTS usability
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Waiting for feedback, more likely after 20.11

DMARC mitigation on the mailing list
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Seems that not changing the subject can resolve DMARC issues
- When mitigations confirmed, techboard will decide on action, if any


                 reply	other threads:[~2020-11-09  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d87fdbe5-6725-1e30-9b32-af62f8c51b10@redhat.com \
    --to=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).