DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: huangdengdui <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
	<aman.deep.singh@intel.com>, <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
	<liuyonglong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: handle IEEE1588 init fail
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 13:52:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8f192e2-3be8-48e1-b7d7-4db24cc41ab5@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240405094427.32d19496@hermes.local>



On 2024/4/6 0:44, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:44:09 +0800
> Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> When the port's timestamping function failed to initialize
>> (for example, the device does not support PTP), the packets
>> received by the hardware do not contain the timestamp.
>> In this case, IEEE1588 packet forwarding should not start.
>> This patch fix it.
>>
>> Plus, adding a failure message when failed to disable PTP.
>>
>> Fixes: a78040c990cb ("app/testpmd: update forward engine beginning")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
> 
> Noticed that ieee1588 part is printing errors to stdout,
> but other parts of test-pmd are using stderr or TEST_PMD_LOG.
> 
> It would be good to decide on one good way to handle this
> across all of testpmd.

Yeah, it's a bit of a mess. Is it better to use TEST_PMD_LOG?
But this is a test app, and modifying it seems unnecessary.
What should we do next?

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-08  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-30  7:44 Dengdui Huang
2024-04-05 15:36 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2024-04-05 16:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-04-08  5:52   ` huangdengdui [this message]
2024-04-08  8:45     ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-04-09  2:06       ` huangdengdui
2024-04-09  2:50         ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-04-17  9:26           ` huangdengdui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d8f192e2-3be8-48e1-b7d7-4db24cc41ab5@huawei.com \
    --to=huangdengdui@huawei.com \
    --cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).