From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349CC101B for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 12:53:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2017 03:53:03 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,457,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="155111123" Received: from tanjianf-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.255.30.130]) ([10.255.30.130]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2017 03:53:01 -0700 To: Yuanhan Liu References: <1503654052-84730-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> <1506606959-76230-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> <1506606959-76230-13-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> <20170930082319.GD6251@yliu-home> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, mtetsuyah@gmail.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com From: "Tan, Jianfeng" Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 18:53:00 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170930082319.GD6251@yliu-home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 12/12] net/vhost: support to run in the secondary process X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:53:05 -0000 On 9/30/2017 4:23 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 01:55:59PM +0000, Jianfeng Tan wrote: >> +static int >> new_device(int vid) >> { >> struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev; >> @@ -610,6 +685,8 @@ new_device(int vid) >> _rte_eth_dev_callback_process(eth_dev, RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_LSC, >> NULL, NULL); >> >> + share_device(vid); >> + > Another question is, have you considered/tested the case when the VM > changes the qeueue number later? Yes, that is a covered test case, we use ethtool to increase the combined queue number; see cover letter for detail. Thanks, Jianfeng > --yliu