From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001F61BB22 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:58:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A4CF40201CF; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 06:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.112.39] (ovpn-112-39.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.39]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE4C1C5B3; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 06:58:09 +0000 (UTC) To: Marvin Liu , tiwei.bie@intel.com Cc: zhihong.wang@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org References: <20180625151710.29437-1-yong.liu@intel.com> <20180625151710.29437-5-yong.liu@intel.com> From: Maxime Coquelin Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:58:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180625151710.29437-5-yong.liu@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.6]); Wed, 27 Jun 2018 06:58:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.6]); Wed, 27 Jun 2018 06:58:10 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.5' DOMAIN:'int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'maxime.coquelin@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/8] net/virtio: free IN_ORDER descriptors before device start X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 06:58:11 -0000 On 06/25/2018 05:17 PM, Marvin Liu wrote: > Add new function for freeing IN_ORDER descriptors. As descriptors will > be allocated and freed sequentially when IN_ORDER feature was > negotiated. There will be no need to utilize chain for freed descriptors > management, only index update is enough. > > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu > Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin Thanks, Maxime