Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mempool: enhance dump function to print ops name

[Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>]

On 8/17/20 2:15 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> Enhance the dump function to also print the ops index
> and associated mempool ops name
>
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>

Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>

with a nit below

> ---
>  lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c
> index 7774f0c8da..10c5cb708f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c
> @@ -1266,6 +1266,7 @@ rte_mempool_dump(FILE *f, struct rte_mempool *mp)
>  	unsigned lcore_id;
>  #endif
>  	struct rte_mempool_memhdr *memhdr;
> +	struct rte_mempool_ops *ops;
>  	unsigned common_count;
>  	unsigned cache_count;
>  	size_t mem_len = 0;
> @@ -1288,6 +1289,10 @@ rte_mempool_dump(FILE *f, struct rte_mempool *mp)
>  
>  	fprintf(f, "  private_data_size=%"PRIu32"\n", mp->private_data_size);
>  
> +	fprintf(f, "  ops_index=%d\n", mp->ops_index);
> +	ops = rte_mempool_get_ops(mp->ops_index);
> +	fprintf(f, "  ops_name: <%s>\n", ops ? ops->name : "NA");

DPDK coding style suggests to use explicit comparison vs NULL, i.e.
ops != NULL ? ops->name : "NA"

> +
>  	STAILQ_FOREACH(memhdr, &mp->mem_list, next)
>  		mem_len += memhdr->len;
>  	if (mem_len != 0) {