From: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" <huwei013@chinasoftinc.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
<xavier.huwei@huawei.com>, <lihuisong@huawei.com>,
Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] app/testpmd: update Rx RSS HASH offload when setting MQ RSS
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:27:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd434230-1bf9-bb81-b568-ff96c2f7d1c8@chinasoftinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02fd6a3c-3810-fbb6-f51d-7c29fc26bfed@intel.com>
Hi, Ferruh Yigit
On 2020/9/23 17:35, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 9/23/2020 8:04 AM, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>> Hi, Ferruh Yigit
>>
>> On 2020/9/23 0:21, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>> On 9/8/2020 3:16 AM, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>>>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>
>>>> Currently, when starting testpmd application without
>>>> '--disable-rss' and
>>>> the number of Rx queue configured is greater than 1, ETH_MQ_RX_RSS
>>>> flag
>>>> is set in port->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode in testpmd application, and
>>>> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH flag is set in rx_offloads
>>>> (dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads) according to the ETH_MQ_RX_RSS
>>>> flag of rxmode.mq_mode in PMD drivers.
>>>>
>>>> However, DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH is not set to rx_offloads maintained
>>>> in testpmd application, this will cause the inconsistent problem that
>>>> rx_offloads is different for testpmd and PMD drivers.
>>>
>>> Yes for DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH, application rx_offload config and
>>> PMD one diverges, for *some* PMDs.
>>>
>>> This is done to have the backward compatibility of the PMD behavior.
>>>
>>> The PMDs that would like to write the provide the calculated hash
>>> value back, overwrites the offload config to enable
>>> 'DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH'. And does more work than user requested,
>>> this shouldn't have any side affect.
>>> Some doesn't provide the hash unless user explicitly requests it.
>>>
>>> Applications shouldn't set it blindly, at least first check if PMD
>>> supports it but even that case, unless it is needed I think HASH
>>> offload shouldn't be requested by default.
>>
>> OK, we are going to do modification to add check if PMD support
>> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH before setting it as below:
>>
>> @@ -3356,11 +3356,13 @@ init_port_config(void)
>> }
>> if (port->dcb_flag == 0) {
>> if (port->dev_conf.rx_adv_conf.rss_conf.rss_hf != 0) {
>> port->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode =
>> (enum rte_eth_rx_mq_mode)
>> (rx_mq_mode & ETH_MQ_RX_RSS);
>> if (port->dev_info.rx_offload_capa &
>> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH)
>> port->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads |=
>> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH;
>> } else
>> port->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode = ETH_MQ_RX_NONE;
>> }
>>
>
> Hi Xavier,
>
> The capability check is correct thing to do, but even in that case I
> am not sure if we should set the config by default.
>
> The reason to extract the 'DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH' offload is to gain
> performance for some NICs, enabling it by default defeats the purpose.
>
> The offload should be enabled when application needs the provided hash
> value.
>
> I can see you are trying to remove the divergence between PMD and
> application config, this can be fixed when all PMDs take this user
> offload request into account instead of overwriting, but for some PMDs
> it is cheaper to provide the hash value instead of checks, so this
> divergence is not easy to address.
>
OK, please ignore this patch and the V2 patch.
http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/78502/
Thanks.
Regards
Xavier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-28 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-08 2:16 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] updates for testpmd Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-09-08 2:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] app/testpmd: update Rx RSS HASH offload when setting MQ RSS Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-09-22 16:21 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-23 7:04 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-09-23 9:35 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-28 12:27 ` Wei Hu (Xavier) [this message]
2020-09-08 2:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/testpmd: retain original FDIR mode when configuring DCB Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-09-22 5:15 ` Ajit Khaparde
2020-09-23 7:14 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-09-24 2:41 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-09-23 7:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: update Rx RSS HASH offload when setting MQ RSS Wei Hu (Xavier)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd434230-1bf9-bb81-b568-ff96c2f7d1c8@chinasoftinc.com \
--to=huwei013@chinasoftinc.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=xavier.huwei@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).