From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B5D42A3D; Tue, 2 May 2023 11:35:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F75E40ED8; Tue, 2 May 2023 11:35:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B3D40E2D for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 11:35:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1683020105; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zROnBS6BpADpwGX2Gay4v/tvIUMIVIZabG2huPez/vg=; b=P41oLfW55xT9/rs17jV7rTp8x93Bw461JWucB091Aq8TUCCWax4r1NebLyd/u78sprAJ0X 3WgktVHRB6oboIbUuTuVpXSgACniYc+8ow+L17R4juiYa/bISLNtX9A01mzkvRUibTvQun CQD4hwRHSjvGRAOjIShm6Rk/VN5fYq4= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-155-5WNCDrSxN9qOqFO5suL-3Q-1; Tue, 02 May 2023 05:35:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5WNCDrSxN9qOqFO5suL-3Q-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f3157128b4so100054345e9.0 for ; Tue, 02 May 2023 02:35:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683020103; x=1685612103; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:references:cc:to:from :content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zROnBS6BpADpwGX2Gay4v/tvIUMIVIZabG2huPez/vg=; b=B9n62+MVZjr6i1IAT6VXWunbMXVgksYxYRxZYBKBXGCVx10Kzycj5U7C1RzqTUsgTP juN0+CEUsAIwOEFGybYygt/9vpC9yomhEK63+P+M/AhE40mjNH4cVYKbYU/5Ehq8SB7q dBoWWvvgDYqrVVfxODGtBRWC6w9911QNzpgY2RU3k7NE9iAqnX7hua3/DsjERDGALDbJ 6Wu3vco1RRiQM2IX27Pbr9WNUh4oP9ackoK0gmq+UIgTj8EPfC08LhADJaIcUCpTyX+O GCjCXPdKmarJawUHpxsr9vT2XUY6lYO2yn3fS+XGxmQExEGQw+ggy0IzBXaPBSelM3kU /DbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxCqGLfrS0mRbJKB1K6J2ouGtmXTOG7Dyy7uqH4LDWQdxB3tVVR wewRllt17L7we6xMXV7HaUkv0zeyfq4x/p7F/8GKFGZ/LDW1AU1rnjl9kVvnhx3CZSr1J8EBwlv s7Os= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2281:b0:3f1:72db:454c with SMTP id 1-20020a05600c228100b003f172db454cmr12065850wmf.19.1683020103246; Tue, 02 May 2023 02:35:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7n0UuzIX7wwHD5WauNEDlqiCSgqewqgkHPkij9qHuAROzBHijpDamj7Js3UQB0ZN367QXHtQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2281:b0:3f1:72db:454c with SMTP id 1-20020a05600c228100b003f172db454cmr12065826wmf.19.1683020102903; Tue, 02 May 2023 02:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.36] ([78.19.110.151]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r17-20020adfdc91000000b002ff2c39d072sm30434302wrj.104.2023.05.02.02.35.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 May 2023 02:35:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 10:35:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 From: Kevin Traynor To: "Xu, HailinX" , "stable@dpdk.org" Cc: "Stokes, Ian" , "Mcnamara, John" , Luca Boccassi , "Xu, Qian Q" , Thomas Monjalon , "Peng, Yuan" , "Chen, Zhaoyan" , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <20230406113734.261672-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> <630da282-4ce1-4e2c-b6f7-7c333c51da2c@redhat.com> Subject: Re: 21.11.4 patches review and test In-Reply-To: <630da282-4ce1-4e2c-b6f7-7c333c51da2c@redhat.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 20/04/2023 11:32, Kevin Traynor wrote: > On 20/04/2023 03:40, Xu, HailinX wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Xu, HailinX >>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 2:13 PM >>> To: Kevin Traynor ; stable@dpdk.org >>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe ; >>> Ali Alnubani ; Walker, Benjamin >>> ; David Christensen ; >>> Hemant Agrawal ; Stokes, Ian >>> ; Jerin Jacob ; Mcnamara, John >>> ; Ju-Hyoung Lee ; Luca >>> Boccassi ; Pei Zhang ; Xu, Qian Q >>> ; Raslan Darawsheh ; Thomas >>> Monjalon ; yanghliu@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan >>> ; Chen, Zhaoyan >>> Subject: RE: 21.11.4 patches review and test >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Kevin Traynor >>>> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 7:38 PM >>>> To: stable@dpdk.org >>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe ; >>>> Ali Alnubani ; Walker, Benjamin >>>> ; David Christensen >>>> ; Hemant Agrawal ; >>>> Stokes, Ian ; Jerin Jacob ; >>>> Mcnamara, John ; Ju-Hyoung Lee >>>> ; Kevin Traynor ; Luca >>>> Boccassi ; Pei Zhang ; Xu, Qian >>>> Q ; Raslan Darawsheh ; >>> Thomas >>>> Monjalon ; yanghliu@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan >>>> ; Chen, Zhaoyan >>>> Subject: 21.11.4 patches review and test >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 21.11.4. >>>> >>>> The planned date for the final release is 25th April. >>>> >>>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report >>>> any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release >>>> the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes. >>>> >>>> A release candidate tarball can be found at: >>>> >>>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v21.11.4-rc1 >>>> >>>> These patches are located at branch 21.11 of dpdk-stable repo: >>>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Kevin >>> >>> HI All, >>> >>> Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11.4-rc1 validation test >>> rate is 85%. No critical issue is found. >>> 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev. >>> New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues >>> 1. pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: >>> performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets >>> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 -- no fix yet >>> 2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under investigating >>> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing >>> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest >>> GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as >>> Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, RHEL8.4, >>> FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc. >>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including >>> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including >>> VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package >>> Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible >>> Descriptor, etc. >>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single >>> core performance test, etc. >>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - >>> QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. >>> - On going. >>> >>> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing >>> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as >>> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf >>> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. >>> - All test done. found bug1. >>> * Cryptodev: >>> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev >>> ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. >>> - Execution rate is 90%. found bug2. >>> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput >>> Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc. >>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Xu, Hailin >> Update the test status for Intel part. completed dpdk21.11.4-rc1 all validation. No critical issue is found. > > Hi. Thanks for testing. > >> 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev. >> New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues >> 1. pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets >> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 --not fix yet, Only the specified platform exists > > Do you know which patch caaused the regression? I'm not fully clear from > the Bz for 20.11. The backported patch ID'd as root cause [0] in 20.11 > is in the previous releases of 20.11 (and 21.11). > > Trying to understand because then it would have shown in testing for > previous releases. Or is this a new test introduced for latest LTS > releases? and if so, what is the baseline performance based on? > > [0] > commit 1c9a7fba5c90e0422b517404499ed106f647bcff > Author: Mattias Rönnblom > Date: Mon Jul 11 14:11:32 2022 +0200 > > net: accept unaligned data in checksum routines > >> 2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under investigating > > ok, thank you. > Hi, it was mentioned in a separate mail that the performance drop issue was not the same as 20.11. Is there any update on that and the failing virtio tests ? Is there a regression introduced since in 21.11.4 ? thanks, Kevin, > Kevin. > >> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing >> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as >> Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, RHEL8.4, FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible Descriptor, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single core performance test, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> >> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing >> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. >> - All test done. found bug1. >> * Cryptodev: >> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. >> - All test done. found bug2. >> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc. >> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >> >> Regards, >> Xu, Hailin >> >