From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB11423A1; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 09:43:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAC940691; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 09:43:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCB540689 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 09:43:36 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1673340216; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EX4/Utm2IJr7CLWDQcF3pqrek/ernq9+bQaTXZAA374=; b=e9jgsayFrebb7MqtU3AM1OiAZTfOHratcawV2eaxrykzU1P6t9Rs1GvenYlvUcm0uZQ36c eQ3NjCkcxY2SZ5qFs0dPCXDZQEmQqlIQMzsjmePt0v3g7T6Al6o9W3O94CfmkXG+VzdC5I AiZNHZnw/04m9ONkBV6xNrRYQzS86OU= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-663-OKXhyXQfODmqXnzc6jMiqQ-1; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 03:43:35 -0500 X-MC-Unique: OKXhyXQfODmqXnzc6jMiqQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4882B29AB3F7; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 08:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.23] (unknown [10.39.208.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81D664014CE2; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 08:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 09:43:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] bbdev: remove offload cost To: Nicolas Chautru , dev@dpdk.org Cc: hernan.vargas@intel.com References: <20221214233346.391973-1-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> From: Maxime Coquelin In-Reply-To: <20221214233346.391973-1-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.2 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 12/15/22 00:33, Nicolas Chautru wrote: > Removing the optional build flag RTE_BBDEV_OFFLOAD_COST > from Intel baseband PMDs and bbdev-test application. > This helps to simplify build variants complexity > causing compilation issues to be missed. > > Maxime, the first commit is actually a miss related > to last commit on top of tree, you may want to merge > these two commits together in the history. > Sorry for missing it earlier. > > > Nicolas Chautru (3): > test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure > drivers/baseband: remove offload cost optional build flag > app/bbdev-test: remove offload cost optional build flag > > app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 29 +------- > drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h | 12 +--- > drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 2 - > drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc200_pmd.c | 2 - > .../fpga_5gnr_fec/rte_fpga_5gnr_fec.c | 10 --- > drivers/baseband/fpga_lte_fec/fpga_lte_fec.c | 10 --- > .../baseband/turbo_sw/bbdev_turbo_software.c | 70 ++++--------------- > 7 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-) > Patch 1 squashed in: http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20221213161855.12970-4-nicolas.chautru@intel.com/ Patches 2 & 3 applied to dpdk-next-baseband/for-main. Thanks, Maxime