From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B3EA00C4; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 15:55:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B4740A7D; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 15:55:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D284069D for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 15:55:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1656683723; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ld7wDuZr4Htj9krM8LUyReGH8qA7syVwoCoXQGLGBUk=; b=NeoZ4TmiXGkjVr7dKEMnGpA9jEBrcvVSjV+k5mL2dm6f+86bKnpNR21VELBMqpWoJOcMKP TYNKgbi4bbeGnTNWqseQMnsWUb/q37YqOheMP3j5ntM5pSqHkiOCbIPeDWCMAW/RQGMyXG hMu6eYszY0/CP+IgjjRZZuWZPkXlGrc= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-530-De_NXzNqPL2VTkNQRova6Q-1; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:55:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: De_NXzNqPL2VTkNQRova6Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2AD7811E75; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 13:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.30] (unknown [10.39.208.30]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB18840336E; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 13:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 15:55:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdpa/ifc: fix vhost message size check issue To: Andy Pei , dev@dpdk.org Cc: chenbo.xia@intel.com, rosen.xu@intel.com, qimaix.xiao@intel.com References: <1655819191-124476-1-git-send-email-andy.pei@intel.com> From: Maxime Coquelin In-Reply-To: <1655819191-124476-1-git-send-email-andy.pei@intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.10 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 6/21/22 15:46, Andy Pei wrote: > For vhost message VHOST_USER_GET_CONFIG, we do not check > payload size in vhost lib, we check payload size in driver > specific ops. > For ifc vdpa driver, we just need to make sure payload size > is not smaller than sizeof(struct virtio_blk_config). > > Fixes: 856d03bcdc54 ("vdpa/ifc: add block operations") > > Signed-off-by: Andy Pei > --- > drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Applied to dpdk-next-virtio/main. Thanks, Maxime