DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Chaoyong He <chaoyong.he@corigine.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: oss-drivers@corigine.com, niklas.soderlund@corigine.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/13] preparation for the rte_flow offload of nfp PMD
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 17:52:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3e67686-d449-1dc3-f324-00a0481cc8f6@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24f3c7ae-17b7-9086-69cd-c785d8d620b5@amd.com>

On 10/5/2022 12:34 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 9/26/2022 7:59 AM, Chaoyong He wrote:
>> This is the first patch series to add the support of rte_flow offload for
>> nfp PMD, includes:
>> Add the support of flower firmware application
>> Add the support of representor port
>> Add the flower service infrastructure
>> Add the cmsg interactive channels between pmd and fw
>>
>> * Changes since v9
>> - Remove the use of rte_eth_tx_burst()
>> - Remove the logics rely on OvS
>>
>> * Changes since v8
>> - Update the nfp.rst
>> - Fix the 'app_hw' to 'app_fw'
>> - Remove the ovs compatible header file
>> - Remove the use of 
>> rte_eth_dev_configure()/rte_eth_rx_burst()/rte_eth_dev_start() API
>>
>> * Changes since v7
>> - Adjust the logics to make sure not break the pci probe process
>> - Change 'app' to 'app_fw' in all logics to avoid confuse
>> - Fix problem about log level
>>
>> * Changes since v6
>> - Fix the compile error
>>
>> * Changes since v5
>> - Compare integer with 0 explicitly
>> - Change helper macro to function
>> - Implement the dummy functions
>> - Remove some unnecessary logics
>>
>> * Changes since v4
>> - Remove the unneeded '__rte_unused' attribute
>> - Fixup a potential memory leak problem
>>
>> * Changes since v3
>> - Add the 'Depends-on' tag
>>
>> * Changes since v2
>> - Remove the use of rte_panic()
>>
>> * Changes since v1
>> - Fix the compile error
>>
>> Depends-on: series-23707 ("Add support of NFP3800 chip and firmware 
>> with NFDk")
>>
>> Chaoyong He (13):
>>    net/nfp: move app specific attributes to own struct
>>    net/nfp: simplify initialization and remove dead code
>>    net/nfp: move app specific init logic to own function
>>    net/nfp: add initial flower firmware support
>>    net/nfp: add flower PF setup logic
>>    net/nfp: add flower ctrl VNIC related logics
>>    net/nfp: move common rxtx function for flower use
>>    net/nfp: add flower ctrl VNIC rxtx logic
>>    net/nfp: add flower representor framework
>>    net/nfp: add flower PF related routines
>>    net/nfp: move rxtx function to header file
>>    net/nfp: add flower PF rxtx logic
>>    net/nfp: add the representor port rxtx logic
>>
> 
> Series applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.
> 

Ahh, this has a small conflict with other set [1], and other one is fix.
To keep fix patch backportable to stable trees, I will get that series 
first and apply this set on top of it, by force push to next-net.

Please highlight these kind of dependencies in advance, in commit log etc.

And can you please double check final code in next-net head?

[1]
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220922130314.694790-2-niklas.soderlund@corigine.com/
[1/2] net/nfp: fix return value of nfp card init function



  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-05 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-26  6:59 Chaoyong He
2022-09-26  6:59 ` [PATCH v10 01/13] net/nfp: move app specific attributes to own struct Chaoyong He
2022-09-26  6:59 ` [PATCH v10 02/13] net/nfp: simplify initialization and remove dead code Chaoyong He
2022-09-26  6:59 ` [PATCH v10 03/13] net/nfp: move app specific init logic to own function Chaoyong He
2022-09-26  6:59 ` [PATCH v10 04/13] net/nfp: add initial flower firmware support Chaoyong He
2022-09-26  6:59 ` [PATCH v10 05/13] net/nfp: add flower PF setup logic Chaoyong He
2022-09-26  6:59 ` [PATCH v10 06/13] net/nfp: add flower ctrl VNIC related logics Chaoyong He
2022-09-26  6:59 ` [PATCH v10 07/13] net/nfp: move common rxtx function for flower use Chaoyong He
2022-09-26  6:59 ` [PATCH v10 08/13] net/nfp: add flower ctrl VNIC rxtx logic Chaoyong He
2022-09-26  6:59 ` [PATCH v10 09/13] net/nfp: add flower representor framework Chaoyong He
2022-09-26  6:59 ` [PATCH v10 10/13] net/nfp: add flower PF related routines Chaoyong He
2022-09-26  6:59 ` [PATCH v10 11/13] net/nfp: move rxtx function to header file Chaoyong He
2022-09-26  6:59 ` [PATCH v10 12/13] net/nfp: add flower PF rxtx logic Chaoyong He
2022-09-26  6:59 ` [PATCH v10 13/13] net/nfp: add the representor port " Chaoyong He
2022-10-05 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 00/13] preparation for the rte_flow offload of nfp PMD Ferruh Yigit
2022-10-05 16:52   ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2022-10-10  8:51     ` Niklas Söderlund

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e3e67686-d449-1dc3-f324-00a0481cc8f6@amd.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=chaoyong.he@corigine.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund@corigine.com \
    --cc=oss-drivers@corigine.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).