From: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@oss.nxp.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] tailq: secondary process may not have all tailq available
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:25:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4633bcc-a57c-8ddc-27ce-9d21f9e82a96@oss.nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8zpiYBZRWp9v+3-DbhXMH753YkuTPv8+goqYKy-q+_q+Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/14/2021 7:14 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:24 AM Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> wrote:
>> Secondary process may not have all the tailq available for
>> mapping, so better to ignore the error.
>>
>> e.g. if the primary process is linked with N libs
>> and secondary process is linked with less number of libs.
>>
>> dpdk-procinfo results into following error:
>> EAL: Cannot initialize tailq: VMBUS_RESOURCE_LIST
> For dpdk-procinfo to complain about vmbus, it means the bus driver has
> been loaded in the secondary, but not in the primary.
> Is this what you intend to do?
>
Yes.
Typically the customer applications are built/linked with only limited
number of bus, devices
dpdk-procinfo is getting compiled with default list as part of dpdk
build. so, if customer is trying to use the default dpdk-procinfo with
their application - there will be differences.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-14 7:13 Hemant Agrawal
2021-01-14 13:44 ` David Marchand
2021-01-18 5:55 ` Hemant Agrawal [this message]
2021-03-25 14:16 ` David Marchand
2021-03-25 16:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-03-25 16:14 ` Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e4633bcc-a57c-8ddc-27ce-9d21f9e82a96@oss.nxp.com \
--to=hemant.agrawal@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).