From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211F5A09D9; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:37:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FA7F90; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:37:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64277F64 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:37:54 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: hH6um0+sYKal1WrqCg5RGhUqXWepph31u9uqYSKgRmeNGpmMCuDWI5kQxYfeNVLc9EZRc+rjmK ++Fr13T5FD/A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9801"; a="188119139" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,469,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="188119139" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Nov 2020 04:37:51 -0800 IronPort-SDR: 73bbRrOyFBFkwgNv9+p8WNgtYRpOqbwn+/9Bnmitqd+caYmNq/06XuS74ll64c7ZQYpvfzEX7k X7ZusQDWI5Bw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,469,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="354834094" Received: from fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.84]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2020 04:37:50 -0800 Received: from shsmsx606.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.216) by fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:37:49 -0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX606.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.216) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:37:48 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:37:48 +0800 From: "Zhang, Qi Z" To: "Su, Simei" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Xing, Beilei" , "Ding, Xuan" Thread-Topic: [PATCH] net/ice: fix full mask issue for ACL rule Thread-Index: AQHWuB8xnhhjFlLDPEqbsglK0MZCqanC3iNQ Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:37:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20201111113005.50620-1-simei.su@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201111113005.50620-1-simei.su@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: fix full mask issue for ACL rule X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Su, Simei > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 7:30 PM > To: Zhang, Qi Z > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei ; Ding, Xuan > ; Su, Simei > Subject: [PATCH] net/ice: fix full mask issue for ACL rule >=20 > A rule with an imperfect match(wildcarding) will be routed through ACL. A > perfect match should be rejected by ACL. >=20 > Fixes: 40d466fa9f76 ("net/ice: support ACL filter in DCF") >=20 > Signed-off-by: Simei Su Acked-by: Qi Zhang Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. Thanks Qi