From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Praveen Shetty <praveen.shetty@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ice: fix incorrect mbuf cleanup function
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:43:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e63850f1-cc15-4678-bf91-1f9bdf44b69a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250221160402.855510-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
On 21/02/2025 17:04, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> The mbuf cleanup function is not being called correctly on close of the
> driver, due to the vector_tx flag not being set correctly on each Tx
> queue. Normally, this causes no visible problems, because the default is
> to have the vector flag unset, which means that, if vector Tx path is
> chosen, we only free every second mbuf in the descriptor vector ring - a
> subtle memory leak.
>
> The reverse case - where we initially configure a port to use a vector
> driver, and then later reconfigure it for scalar - causes a segfault on
> close, as the vector cleanup is used on a scalar SW ring, and that
> vector path treats the extra metadata in the SW ring as mbufs to be
> freed.
>
> This is due to an inconsistency across drivers on port start: in e.g.
> the i40e driver, the Rx and Tx functions are chosen before the
> individual queues are started, while in ice driver the order is
> reversed. Because the Tx function selection is done after the queues
> are initialized, the initialized queues use an old value of the overall
> flag indicating if a vector Tx path is being used.
>
> Fix the issue by moving the Rx and Tx path selection before queue start.
>
> Fixes: 552979dfb1c9 ("net/intel: create common Tx queue mbuf cleanup")
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-24 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-21 16:04 Bruce Richardson
2025-02-24 13:43 ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e63850f1-cc15-4678-bf91-1f9bdf44b69a@intel.com \
--to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=praveen.shetty@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).