DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>,
	"Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost add vectorized data path
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:10:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6eeb62672274dc5998ee13550ad1e63@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d902e14-1e4f-31d9-c7f6-7a57e00186ab@redhat.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 4:22 PM
> To: Liu, Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>;
> Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost add vectorized data path
> 
> Hi Marvin,
> 
> On 10/9/20 10:14 AM, Marvin Liu wrote:
> > Packed ring format is imported since virtio spec 1.1. All descriptors
> > are compacted into one single ring when packed ring format is on. It is
> > straight forward that ring operations can be accelerated by utilizing
> > SIMD instructions.
> >
> > This patch set will introduce vectorized data path in vhost library. If
> > vectorized option is on, operations like descs check, descs writeback,
> > address translation will be accelerated by SIMD instructions. On skylake
> > server, it can bring 6% performance gain in loopback case and around 4%
> > performance gain in PvP case.
> 
> IMHO, 4% gain on PVP is not a significant gain if we compare to the
> added complexity. Moreover, I guess this is 4% gain with testpmd-based
> PVP? If this is the case it may be even lower with OVS-DPDK PVP
> benchmark, I will try to do a benchmark this week.
> 

Maxime, 
I have observed around 3% gain with OVS-DPDK in first version. But the number is not reliable as datapath has been changed. 
I will try again after fixed OVS integration issue with latest dpdk. 

> Thanks,
> Maxime
> 
> > Vhost application can choose whether using vectorized acceleration, just
> > like external buffer feature. If platform or ring format not support
> > vectorized function, vhost will fallback to use default batch function.
> > There will be no impact in current data path.
> >
> > v3:
> > * rename vectorized datapath file
> > * eliminate the impact when avx512 disabled
> > * dynamically allocate memory regions structure
> > * remove unlikely hint for in_order
> >
> > v2:
> > * add vIOMMU support
> > * add dequeue offloading
> > * rebase code
> >
> > Marvin Liu (5):
> >   vhost: add vectorized data path
> >   vhost: reuse packed ring functions
> >   vhost: prepare memory regions addresses
> >   vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue
> >   vhost: add packed ring vectorized enqueue
> >
> >  doc/guides/nics/vhost.rst           |   5 +
> >  doc/guides/prog_guide/vhost_lib.rst |  12 +
> >  drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c   |  17 +-
> >  lib/librte_vhost/meson.build        |  16 ++
> >  lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h        |   1 +
> >  lib/librte_vhost/socket.c           |   5 +
> >  lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c            |  11 +
> >  lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h            | 239 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c       |  26 +++
> >  lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c       | 258 ++++-----------------
> >  lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net_avx.c   | 344 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  11 files changed, 718 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net_avx.c
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-12  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-19  3:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 " Marvin Liu
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/5] vhost: " Marvin Liu
2020-09-21  6:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] vhost " Marvin Liu
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] vhost: " Marvin Liu
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] vhost: reuse packed ring functions Marvin Liu
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] vhost: prepare memory regions addresses Marvin Liu
2020-10-06 15:06       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue Marvin Liu
2020-10-06 14:59       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-08  7:05         ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-06 15:18       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-09  7:59         ` Liu, Yong
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized enqueue Marvin Liu
2020-10-06 15:00       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-08  7:09         ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-06 13:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] vhost add vectorized data path Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-08  6:20       ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-09  8:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] vhost: " Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] vhost: reuse packed ring functions Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] vhost: prepare memory regions addresses Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized enqueue Marvin Liu
2020-10-12  8:21     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost add vectorized data path Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-12  9:10       ` Liu, Yong [this message]
2020-10-12  9:57         ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-12 13:24           ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-15 15:28       ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-15 15:35         ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/5] vhost: reuse packed ring functions Marvin Liu
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/5] vhost: prepare memory regions addresses Marvin Liu
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue Marvin Liu
2020-09-18 13:44   ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-09-21  6:26     ` Liu, Yong
2020-09-21  7:47       ` Liu, Yong
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized enqueue Marvin Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e6eeb62672274dc5998ee13550ad1e63@intel.com \
    --to=yong.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).