From: "Nicolau, Radu" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <yux.jiang@intel.com>,
Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/iavf: fix segmentation offload buffer size
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:52:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e727595b-bfb2-af6f-aff6-07fad49238f7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72602dd6-b020-13cd-df70-13a06a57d9a7@intel.com>
On 2/15/2022 12:48 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 2/15/2022 12:44 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 2/15/2022 12:30 PM, Nicolau, Radu wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/15/2022 11:19 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>>> On 2/15/2022 10:47 AM, Nicolau, Radu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/15/2022 10:06 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/10/2022 1:09 PM, Radu Nicolau wrote:
>>>>>>> This reverts commit ff8b8bcd2ebe, which resulted in incorrect
>>>>>>> buffer size
>>>>>>> being computed for TSO packets.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fixes: ff8b8bcd2ebe ("net/iavf: fix segmentation offload
>>>>>>> condition")
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Commit 'ff8b8bcd2ebe' was already fixing segmentation offload,
>>>>>> are we having the initial issue back when this patch reverted?
>>>>>> Is there a fix for that initial issue?
>>>>> The initial issue was around a very specific usecase - IPsec
>>>>> transport mode TSO and it is very likely back with this revert.
>>>>> But it's a much less severe impact than general traffic TSO.
>>>>
>>>> Got it, so this revert brings back an issue, should
>>>> we document this in the commit log of this patch?
>>>> Plus should we create a Bugzilla etc to record the
>>>> introduced issue?
>>>
>>> I plan to follow up with a fix shortly.
>>>
>
> Or does it make sense to combine that fix with this patch?
>
I sent a v2 that does this. Sorry all for the mess :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-10 13:09 Radu Nicolau
2022-02-15 6:16 ` Huang, ZhiminX
2022-02-15 7:59 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-02-15 10:06 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-15 10:46 ` Kevin Traynor
2022-02-15 11:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-15 10:47 ` Nicolau, Radu
2022-02-15 11:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-15 12:30 ` Nicolau, Radu
2022-02-15 12:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-15 12:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-15 15:52 ` Nicolau, Radu [this message]
2022-02-15 15:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Radu Nicolau
2022-02-20 5:35 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e727595b-bfb2-af6f-aff6-07fad49238f7@intel.com \
--to=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=yux.jiang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).