Re: 20.11.4 patches review and test

["Xueming(Steven) Li" <xuemingl@nvidia.com>]

On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 11:35 +0000, Jiang, YuX wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jiang, YuX <yux.jiang@intel.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 6:01 PM
> > To: Xueming Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Lin, Xueqin
> > <xueqin.lin@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe
> > <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>;
> > Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin
> > <benjamin.walker@intel.com>; David Christensen
> > <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Govindharajan, Hariprasad
> > <hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> > <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com>; Jerin
> > Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John
> > <john.mcnamara@intel.com>;
> > Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor
> > <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; Pei Zhang
> > <pezhang@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Raslan
> > Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> > <thomas@monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan <yuan.peng@intel.com>; Chen,
> > Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: 20.11.4 patches review and test
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Xueming Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 12:15 AM
> > > To: stable@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: xuemingl@nvidia.com; dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe
> > > <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>; Ali Alnubani
> > > <alialnu@nvidia.com>;
> > > Walker, Benjamin <benjamin.walker@intel.com>; David Christensen
> > > <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Govindharajan, Hariprasad
> > > <hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> > > <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com>;
> > > Jerin
> > > Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John
> > <john.mcnamara@intel.com>;
> > > Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor
> > > <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; Pei
> > > Zhang
> > > <pezhang@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Raslan
> > > Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> > <thomas@monjalon.net>;
> > > Peng, Yuan <yuan.peng@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan
> > > <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
> > > Subject: 20.11.4 patches review and test
> > > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 20.11.4.
> > > 
> > > The planned date for the final release is 31th December.
> > > 
> > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and
> > > report
> > > any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final
> > > release
> > > the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release
> > > notes.
> > > 
> > > A release candidate tarball can be found at:
> > > 
> > >     https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%
> > > 2F%2Fdpdk.org%2Fbrowse%2Fdpdk-stable%2Ftag%2F%3Fid%3Dv20.11.4-
> > > rc1&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cxuemingl%40nvidia.com%7Cc9cdc823fce64be118
> > > 0908d9bbd13e8a%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C63774
> > > 7329661244261%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjo
> > > iV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=DtlL0BYV
> > > vWm7JE9JV%2BliWzq6R%2FHmKRSNKbc10nmF81Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > 
> > > These patches are located at branch 20.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
> > >     https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%
> > > 2F%2Fdpdk.org%2Fbrowse%2Fdpdk-
> > > stable%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cxuemingl%40nvidia.com%7Cc9cdc823fce6
> > > 4be1180908d9bbd13e8a%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7
> > > C637747329661244261%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiL
> > > CJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=KO
> > > 3YKk3gXS%2B73gMdQf9MFohT9q55YiDW8df%2F12ZepMs%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > Xueming Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
> > > 
> > Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk20.11.4-rc1
> > test execution
> > rate is 80%. Currently, find three bugs, two bugs have fix now.
> > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
> > * Build or compile:
> > 	*Build: cover the build test combination with latest
> > GCC/Clang/ICC
> > version and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu20.04, Fedora34,
> > RHEL8.4,
> > etc.
> > 		- All test done.
> > 		- Two bugs are found in 20.11.4-rc1.
> > 			- dpdk-20.11.4]kernel/linux/kni/rte_kni.ko
> > build
> > failed on OpenSuse15.3 with gcc7.5.0&clang11.0.1
> > 				- fix link:
> > http://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/20211208103410.835542-1-
> > ferruh.yigit@intel.com/T/#u , verify passed by Intel
> > 			-
> > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=894
> > [dpdk-20.11.4]
> > lib/librte_eal.a.p/librte_eal_common_rte_random.c.obj build
> > failed on WIN10 with clang8.0.0
> > 				- fix link:
> > http://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/20211207141644.369624-1-
> > dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com/T/#u, verify passed by Intel
> > 	* PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including
> > RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
> > 		- All test done. No new issue is found.
> > 	* VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-
> > RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
> > 
> > 		- All test done. No new issue is found.
> > 	* PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch
> > features/Package
> > Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Share
> > code update/Flexible Descriptor, etc.
> > 		- Execution rate is 80%. No new issue is found.
> > 	* Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios
> > including
> > PF/VF single core performance test, RFC2544 Zero packet loss
> > performance
> > test, etc.
> > 		- Execution rate is 50%. No big performance drop.
> > 	* IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec
> > library basic
> > test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
> > 		- All passed.
> > # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
> > 	* Virtio: both function and performance test are covered.
> > Such as
> > PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf
> > testing/VMAWARE ESXI 7.0u3, etc.
> > 		- Execution rate is 80%. No new issue is found.
> > 	* Cryptodev:
> > 		*Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev
> > API
> > testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
> > 			- All test done.
> > 			- One new bug about "[dpdk-LTS-20.11.4-
> > rc1]
> > cryptodev_qat_asym_autotest is failing" is found, Intel dev is
> > under
> > investigating.
> > 				bad commit id is commit
> > 2f2c2b5b7e7ae4942b4b3686bce2eb856fee447d
> > 				Author: Przemyslaw Zegan
> > <przemyslawx.zegan@intel.com>
> > 				Date: Wed Nov 3 15:08:23 2021
> > +0000
> > 				common/qat: fix queue pairs number
> > 		*Performance test: test scenarios including
> > Thoughput
> > Performance /Cryptodev Latency, etc.
> > 			- All test done.
> 
> Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk20.11.4-rc1 test
> is almost finished. Totally find three bugs, two bugs have fix now.
> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
> * Build: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang/ICC
> version and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu20.04, Fedora34,
> RHEL8.4, etc.
> - All test done.
> - Two bugs are found in 20.11.4-rc1.
> Bug1, "dpdk-20.11.4]kernel/linux/kni/rte_kni.ko build failed on
> OpenSuse15.3 with gcc7.5.0&clang11.0.1"
>  Has fix link: http://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/20211208103410.835542-1-
> ferruh.yigit@intel.com/T/#u
> Bug2, "https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=894 [dpdk-20.11.4]
> lib/librte_eal.a.p/librte_eal_common_rte_random.c.obj build failed on
> WIN10 with clang8.0.0"
>  Has fix link: http://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/20211207141644.369624-1-
> dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com/T/#u
> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including
> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. 
> - All test done. No new issue is found. 
> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-
> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN,
> etc.		
> - All test done. No new issue is found. 	
> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package
> Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible
> Descriptor, etc.
> - All test done. No new issue is found. 
> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including
> PF/VF single core performance test, RFC2544 Zero packet loss
> performance test, etc.
> - All test done. No big performance drop.
> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic
> test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
> - All passed.			
> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as
> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf
> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 7.0u3, etc.
> - All test done. No new issue is found.
> * Cryptodev: 
> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API
> testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
> - All test done. Find one bug , Intel dev is under investigating.
> - Bug3 "[dpdk-LTS-20.11.4-rc1] cryptodev_qat_asym_autotest is
> failing"
>  bad commit id is commit 2f2c2b5b7e7ae4942b4b3686bce2eb856fee447d
>  Author: Przemyslaw Zegan <przemyslawx.zegan@intel.com>
>  Date: Wed Nov 3 15:08:23 2021 +0000
>  common/qat: fix queue pairs number

Hi Jiang & Xueqin,

Thanks very much for the report!

I can't reach Przemyslaw, is there any internal progress regarding
bug3? 

> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance
> /Cryptodev Latency, etc.
> - All test done.