From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f175.google.com (mail-wj0-f175.google.com [209.85.210.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBB3F60E for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:14:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f175.google.com with SMTP id i20so101649890wjn.2 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 05:14:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o18RYEXRfW1qhHHPUKJeEozVjz8/SQNul0xF1mwjB6o=; b=k5S+PwysDcsdGAl6R2yLd7arbtmeEh9R26x/R2RZ77+R/6Do3tW9/UW+zF208wo4Ul m+ovOsSPIpK5Tjq11nhuuqm88kdaf48IhxXjn6Jn/0lK6WpidlYtPYHetMoUKVZEQKTU rP2fI255anSRTRkOJH3i6xU0j8UTKR0/kEpsDQoETTod8MmhmwOLKmKEIlnrvCLmdnE6 DD8G+Nmho6oNUbnhRfFtgNYXKiAuKqwVnQ78W7DNjfpk5ukRDimz9AkyR29vvztShl+s MXqsY9U2K0hhJUijrWvb1IBCIRQXNP7oQ0b0fJwLS84LyCz8/NRYS7hgm23rRsHTwE+K jNvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=o18RYEXRfW1qhHHPUKJeEozVjz8/SQNul0xF1mwjB6o=; b=rBCLVK3IAXXJPfVBc2ihzeqMarXdRwUXWyBN2ndexSK1NspBih9ZRzYA1vYRRogtRS b9mQuUW5wrYrLjVnrCMU91lYEG8SB9JGanV+Bz583WVEp38OZ260f7zGTGn69Ro3+GA7 pcdXrqHRJQCPDi53+1EikX1li9wobObbaglkwjnXY+T75zpr7tkvEH3Hdeo289arIqHG a0UGzLQcm8dMImjyfn9cYqs2i648KwZfyv42EnvPkqYUynitrOTZp40qSgr3uyAEnNk0 Ra73CAt6g+AGuLMc6YQxrJuTHApDi2mqQiyts4q2S1nwlacNnXz7Qbu/LH9D2Q4uK7E7 Zzag== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJ5bOqQPqb3a8QavlTx8ZpOShROQF89v5ZBwRddJdLKIUwgE+ZGxIGs4DMe/iFNF48l X-Received: by 10.194.144.141 with SMTP id sm13mr4979730wjb.207.1484140446377; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 05:14:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.16.0.240] (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ct7sm8513650wjc.2.2017.01.11.05.14.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 05:14:05 -0800 (PST) To: Ferruh Yigit , "Zhang, Helin" , "Lu, Wenzhuo" , dev@dpdk.org References: <1480637533-37425-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <1484032580-60134-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <1598a0c7f80.27fc.bb328046f2889bc8f44aafa891a44dd2@6wind.com> Cc: "'JOSHI, KAUSTUBH'" , "'DANIELS, EDWARD'" , "'ZELEZNIAK, ALEX'" From: Vincent JARDIN Organization: www.6wind.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:14:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 00/25] Support VFD on i40e X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:14:07 -0000 Le 10/01/2017 à 22:32, Ferruh Yigit a écrit : > What do you think to continue high level DPDK PF discussion in mail > thread for other pathset? So that we can continue to work on this one. First, we need to assess or not if it makes sense to go toward Linux kernel or DPDK based PF. If Linux kernel is used, then DPDK does not need VFD related modifications. VFD demonstrates that there are some needs of features, but it pushes the new path of a fork of PF drivers.