From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Steve Yang <stevex.yang@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, xiaoyun.li@intel.com,
bernard.iremonger@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net,
andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, qiming.yang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] app/testpmd: fix dynamic config error
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:15:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed84ebc6-c69c-8497-5e83-89a8053ef4e1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564fad2d-3861-f4e3-2129-c0c6b3638d74@intel.com>
On 1/22/2021 5:04 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 1/22/2021 9:01 AM, Steve Yang wrote:
>> The offloads of 'tx/rx_conf' didn't keep up with the corresponding
>> offloads of 'dev_conf' if rx queue capability was 0, it would cause
>> the configuration invalid.
>>
>> For example:
>> Configuring 'max-pkt-len' would change 'rx_offloads' in dev_conf while
>> rx_conf.offloads of each queue still kept the old value.
>> It would cause the failure of offloads check in 'rte_eth_rx_queue_setup'.
>>
>> This patch applied tx/rx offloads configuration for each queue
>> once it changed and corresponding tx/rx queue capability was 0.
>>
>> Fixes: 5e91aeef218c ("app/testpmd: fix offload flags after port config")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steve Yang <stevex.yang@intel.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>> index a2c9aad960..8307c7f9e9 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>> @@ -3296,7 +3296,11 @@ rxtx_port_config(struct rte_port *port)
>> for (qid = 0; qid < nb_rxq; qid++) {
>> offloads = port->rx_conf[qid].offloads;
>> port->rx_conf[qid] = port->dev_info.default_rxconf;
>> - if (offloads != 0)
>> + if (port->dev_info.rx_queue_offload_capa == 0 &&
>> + offloads != port->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads)
>> + port->rx_conf[qid].offloads =
>> + port->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads;
>> + else if (offloads != 0)
>> port->rx_conf[qid].offloads = offloads;
>
> I am still concerned to use port offloads to set the queue specific offloads,
> this may lead unexpected result.
>
> Below is what Steve provided as reproduce steps [1], I think that is application
> (testpmd) miss-configuration to update 'max-pkt-len' but not update the
> JUMBO_FRAME offload flag and MTU accordingly.
>
> What do you think update the JUMBO_FRAME offload flag (both for port and queues)
> according and set MTU according on the testpmd command where 'max-pkt-len' is
> set? This is more like your first version.
>
>
>
> [1]
> ----------------------------------------------
> # x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/dpdk-testpmd -c 0xf -n 4 -- -i
> --max-pkt-len=9000 --tx-offloads=0x8000 --rxq=4 --txq=4 --disable-rss
> testpmd> set verbose 3
> testpmd> start
> testpmd> stop
> testpmd> port stop all
> testpmd> port config all max-pkt-len 1518
> testpmd> port start all
> Configuring Port 0 (socket 1)
> Ethdev port_id=0 rx_queue_id=0, new added offloads 0x800 must be within
> per-queue offload capabilities 0x0 in rte_eth_rx_queue_setup()
> Fail to configure port 0 rx queues//<-- Fail error info;
> ------------------------------------------------
>
Indeed first patch of this series solves the MTU problem with "port config all
max-pkt-len" command (although it ignores 'max_rx_pkt_len' is only valid when
JUMBO_FRAME flag is set)
And second patch updates the JUMBO_FRAME flag in the command function, same as I
suggested above.
Only if second patch extended to update JUMBO_FRAME flag for all queues in
'update_jumbo_frame_offload()', this patch can be dropped, what do you think?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-22 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-22 8:13 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] app/testpmd: fix dynamic config error for max-pkt-len Steve Yang
2020-12-23 2:27 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2020-12-23 8:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: fix dynamic config error Steve Yang
2020-12-23 9:00 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-01-13 8:13 ` Chen, BoX C
2021-01-19 15:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-22 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] fix 'max-pkt-len' errors Steve Yang
2021-01-22 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] ethdev: fix MTU doesn't update when jumbo frame disabled Steve Yang
2021-01-25 7:12 ` Huisong Li
[not found] ` <DM6PR11MB43628A600BAAEC75FFF1343BF9BD9@DM6PR11MB4362.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2021-01-25 12:38 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-22 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] app/testpmd: fix max-pkt-len option invalid Steve Yang
2021-01-22 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] app/testpmd: fix dynamic config error Steve Yang
2021-01-22 17:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-22 17:15 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2021-01-25 8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] fix 'max-pkt-len' errors Steve Yang
2021-01-25 8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: fix MTU doesn't update when jumbo frame disabled Steve Yang
2021-01-25 12:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-25 8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] app/testpmd: fix max-pkt-len option invalid Steve Yang
2021-01-25 14:45 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-25 15:46 ` Lance Richardson
2021-01-25 17:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-25 18:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] app/testpmd: fix setting maximum packet length Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-25 19:41 ` Lance Richardson
2021-01-26 0:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-26 3:22 ` Lance Richardson
2021-01-26 3:45 ` Lance Richardson
2021-01-26 7:54 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-01-26 11:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-28 21:36 ` Lance Richardson
2021-01-28 22:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-26 9:02 ` [dpdk-dev] " Wisam Monther
2021-01-27 3:04 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-01-28 1:57 ` Chen, BoX C
2021-01-28 9:18 ` Wisam Monther
2021-01-28 9:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-28 11:08 ` Wisam Monther
2021-01-28 12:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-29 9:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed84ebc6-c69c-8497-5e83-89a8053ef4e1@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=stevex.yang@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).