From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
To: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip_frag: replace the rte memcpy with memcpy
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 23:49:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed919af1-e979-009a-4727-e6351ecee55a@yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1655561380-64616-1-git-send-email-chcchc88@163.com>
18/06/2022 15:09, Huichao Cai пишет:
> To resolve the compilation warning,replace the rte_memcpy with memcpy.
> Modify in file test_ipfrag.c and rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_ipfrag.c | 13 ++++++-------
> lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c | 7 +++----
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
> index dc62b0e..ba0ffd0 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
>
> #include <rte_ip_frag.h>
> #include <rte_mbuf.h>
> -#include <rte_memcpy.h>
> #include <rte_random.h>
>
> #define NUM_MBUFS 128
> @@ -147,13 +146,13 @@ static void ut_teardown(void)
> if (opt_copied) {
> expected_opt->len =
> sizeof(expected_first_frag_ipv4_opts_copied);
> - rte_memcpy(expected_opt->data,
> + memcpy(expected_opt->data,
> expected_first_frag_ipv4_opts_copied,
> sizeof(expected_first_frag_ipv4_opts_copied));
> } else {
> expected_opt->len =
> sizeof(expected_first_frag_ipv4_opts_nocopied);
> - rte_memcpy(expected_opt->data,
> + memcpy(expected_opt->data,
> expected_first_frag_ipv4_opts_nocopied,
> sizeof(expected_first_frag_ipv4_opts_nocopied));
> }
> @@ -161,13 +160,13 @@ static void ut_teardown(void)
> if (opt_copied) {
> expected_opt->len =
> sizeof(expected_sub_frag_ipv4_opts_copied);
> - rte_memcpy(expected_opt->data,
> + memcpy(expected_opt->data,
> expected_sub_frag_ipv4_opts_copied,
> sizeof(expected_sub_frag_ipv4_opts_copied));
> } else {
> expected_opt->len =
> sizeof(expected_sub_frag_ipv4_opts_nocopied);
> - rte_memcpy(expected_opt->data,
> + memcpy(expected_opt->data,
> expected_sub_frag_ipv4_opts_nocopied,
> sizeof(expected_sub_frag_ipv4_opts_nocopied));
> }
> @@ -227,7 +226,7 @@ static void ut_teardown(void)
> hdr->src_addr = rte_cpu_to_be_32(0x8080808);
> hdr->dst_addr = rte_cpu_to_be_32(0x8080404);
>
> - rte_memcpy(hdr + 1, opt.data, opt.len);
> + memcpy(hdr + 1, opt.data, opt.len);
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -312,7 +311,7 @@ static void ut_teardown(void)
> char *iph_opt = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(mb[i],
> char *, sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr));
> opt->len = opt_len;
> - rte_memcpy(opt->data, iph_opt, opt_len);
> + memcpy(opt->data, iph_opt, opt_len);
> } else {
> opt->len = RTE_IPV4_HDR_OPT_MAX_LEN;
> memset(opt->data, RTE_IPV4_HDR_OPT_EOL,
> diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> index a19f6fd..27a8ad2 100644
> --- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> +++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
> #include <stddef.h>
> #include <errno.h>
>
> -#include <rte_memcpy.h>
> #include <rte_ether.h>
>
> #include "ip_frag_common.h"
> @@ -26,7 +25,7 @@ static inline void __fill_ipv4hdr_frag(struct rte_ipv4_hdr *dst,
> const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *src, uint16_t header_len,
> uint16_t len, uint16_t fofs, uint16_t dofs, uint32_t mf)
> {
> - rte_memcpy(dst, src, header_len);
> + memcpy(dst, src, header_len);
I am fine with replacements in test and inside the lib, for cases
where 'len' parameter is constant value.
Though as I said before, here 'header_len' is not a constant value.
Are you sure it will not introduce any performance regression?
> fofs = (uint16_t)(fofs + (dofs >> RTE_IPV4_HDR_FO_SHIFT));
> fofs = (uint16_t)(fofs | mf << RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_SHIFT);
> dst->fragment_offset = rte_cpu_to_be_16(fofs);
> @@ -48,7 +47,7 @@ static inline uint16_t __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
> struct rte_ipv4_hdr *iph_opt = (struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)ipopt_frag_hdr;
>
> ipopt_len = 0;
> - rte_memcpy(ipopt_frag_hdr, iph, sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr));
> + memcpy(ipopt_frag_hdr, iph, sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr));
> ipopt_frag_hdr += sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
>
> uint8_t *p_opt = iph + sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
> @@ -65,7 +64,7 @@ static inline uint16_t __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
> break;
>
> if (RTE_IPV4_HDR_OPT_COPIED(*p_opt)) {
> - rte_memcpy(ipopt_frag_hdr + ipopt_len,
> + memcpy(ipopt_frag_hdr + ipopt_len,
> p_opt, p_opt[1]);
> ipopt_len += p_opt[1];
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-18 14:09 Huichao Cai
2022-06-21 15:11 ` David Marchand
2022-06-22 22:49 ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
2022-06-23 2:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-06-23 14:24 ` David Marchand
2022-06-24 17:25 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-06-27 11:12 ` Liang Ma
2022-06-23 14:26 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed919af1-e979-009a-4727-e6351ecee55a@yandex.ru \
--to=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
--cc=chcchc88@163.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).