DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
Cc: Fady Bader <fady@mellanox.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
	<tbashar@mellanox.com>, <talshn@mellanox.com>,
	<yohadt@mellanox.com>, <harini.ramakrishnan@microsoft.com>,
	<ocardona@microsoft.com>, <pallavi.kadam@intel.com>,
	<ranjit.menon@intel.com>, <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	<mdr@ashroe.eu>, <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] mempool: use generic memory management
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:40:26 +0300
Message-ID: <ee7c94bf-1df7-8947-4bdd-64831662bebb@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12936534.z0KI8IRTVO@thomas>

On 6/2/20 12:14 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 01/06/2020 21:59, Dmitry Kozlyuk:
>> 1. What do you think about changing rte_ to rte_eal_ prefix for memory
>> management wrappers in MM series as Andrew Rybchenko suggested for v1? Since
>> the functions are DPDK-internal, this sounds reasonable to me.
> 
> For lib-internal function, the prefix should not start with rte_.
> For exported function (even if internal), the prefix should be rte_[component]_.
> For memory related functions, rte_mem_ is better than rte_eal_.

Yes, I agree.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-02  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-01 10:31 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] build mempool on Windows Fady Bader
2020-06-01 10:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] eal: disable function versioning " Fady Bader
2020-06-01 19:55   ` Neil Horman
2020-06-01 21:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [EXTERNAL] " Omar Cardona
2020-06-02 10:27       ` Neil Horman
2020-06-02 10:40         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-06-11 10:09           ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-06-01 10:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] mempool: use generic memory management Fady Bader
2020-06-01 19:59   ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-06-01 20:47     ` Ranjit Menon
2020-06-01 21:14     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-06-02  7:40       ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2020-06-01 10:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] eal: export needed functions for mempool Fady Bader
2020-06-01 10:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] mempool: mempool build on Windows Fady Bader
2020-06-02  7:41   ` Andrew Rybchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ee7c94bf-1df7-8947-4bdd-64831662bebb@solarflare.com \
    --to=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
    --cc=fady@mellanox.com \
    --cc=harini.ramakrishnan@microsoft.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=ocardona@microsoft.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=pallavi.kadam@intel.com \
    --cc=ranjit.menon@intel.com \
    --cc=talshn@mellanox.com \
    --cc=tbashar@mellanox.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yohadt@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git