From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61EEA0C48; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 01:27:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06FD4069E; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 01:27:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED584003C for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 01:27:50 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10037"; a="209167793" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,330,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="209167793" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jul 2021 16:27:49 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,330,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="497354511" Received: from irsmsx606.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.146.139]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Jul 2021 16:27:48 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by IRSMSX606.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.146.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.4; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 00:27:45 +0100 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.008; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 07:27:43 +0800 From: "Zhang, Qi Z" To: Thomas Monjalon CC: "Liu, Lingyu" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Xing, Beilei" , "Wu, Jingjing" , "Guo, Junfeng" , "Yigit, Ferruh" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Support outer layer FDIR for GTPoGRE packet Thread-Index: AQHXcgPWIXQ1fR4GKES3o1v8qqZ1D6s1PIvQgADA0ICAAJsDgA== Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 23:27:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20210706074258.1345934-1-lingyu.liu@intel.com> <74ae6b27f4fe4fc08efc7ef359aa6e10@intel.com> <232231914.2rZhWiTFky@thomas> In-Reply-To: <232231914.2rZhWiTFky@thomas> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Support outer layer FDIR for GTPoGRE packet X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 6:11 AM > To: Zhang, Qi Z > Cc: Liu, Lingyu ; dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei > ; Wu, Jingjing ; Guo, > Junfeng ; Yigit, Ferruh > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Support outer layer FDIR for > GTPoGRE packet >=20 > 06/07/2021 04:40, Zhang, Qi Z: > > From: Liu, Lingyu > > > Add support for outer most L3 layer FDIR for GTPoGRE packet. GTPU > > > TEID FDIR is supported for GTPoGRE flow pattern without inner L3,L4 > > > fields. GTPU enhance header is supported. > > > > > > Lingyu Liu (3): > > > net/iavf: add flow pattern for GTPoGRE > > > net/iavf: add AVF FDIR for GTPoGRE tunnel packet > > > doc: release note for GTPoGRE FDIR > > > > Acked-by: Qi Zhang > > > > Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. >=20 > The difference with the series "support AVF RSS and FDIR for GTPoGRE > packet" > is not reflected in titles. > I prefer not pulling these 2 series so you can rework the titles and rele= ase > notes in dpdk-next-net-intel. > Note: the release notes should be updated in each patch, not separately. >=20 OK, I think we can merge 2 series into one as well as the following fix.