From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1E6137C for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 14:29:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jul 2018 05:29:28 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,347,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="72070463" Received: from aburakov-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.0.191]) ([10.252.0.191]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jul 2018 05:29:25 -0700 To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Neil Horman , John McNamara , Marko Kovacevic , ray.kinsella@intel.com, kuralamudhan.ramakrishnan@intel.com, louise.m.daly@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com References: <1708116.Opvd7OZZtO@xps> From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 13:29:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1708116.Opvd7OZZtO@xps> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/9] doc: add deprecation notice for EAL command line options X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 12:29:29 -0000 On 13-Jul-18 1:13 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 13/07/2018 12:27, Anatoly Burakov: >> Options --no-shconf and --huge-unlink will be removed, and >> replaced with --in-memory option, which will be a superset >> of these two, and an offially support method to run DPDK >> entirely in memory. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov > > The deprecation notice should be sent separately in order to wait > for enough agreement. > Really, we don't have to deprecate old options. It would be nice to remove them as half-measures and replace them with a proper implementation, but it's not strictly necessary, so i'll make it a separate patch. -- Thanks, Anatoly