From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
To: Ariel Otilibili <ariel.otilibili@6wind.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Rybchenko" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mempool: make rte_mempool_create_empty a single-exit
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:31:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0371b52754c44c789fa8b1250bfc023@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250120122156.2480524-3-ariel.otilibili@6wind.com>
> For properly setting rte_errno, and exiting rte_mempool_create_empty()
> from a single place.
>
> Bugzilla ID: 1559
> Signed-off-by: Ariel Otilibili <ariel.otilibili@6wind.com>
> ---
> lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> index 1e4f24783c0b..3f9a4a1771d3 100644
> --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> @@ -831,20 +831,20 @@ rte_mempool_create_empty(const char *name, unsigned n, unsigned elt_size,
> /* asked for zero items */
> if (n == 0) {
> rte_errno = EINVAL;
> - return NULL;
> + goto exit;
> }
>
> /* asked cache too big */
> if (cache_size > RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE ||
> CALC_CACHE_FLUSHTHRESH(cache_size) > n) {
> rte_errno = EINVAL;
> - return NULL;
> + goto exit;
> }
>
> /* enforce only user flags are passed by the application */
> if ((flags & ~RTE_MEMPOOL_VALID_USER_FLAGS) != 0) {
> rte_errno = EINVAL;
> - return NULL;
> + goto exit;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ rte_mempool_create_empty(const char *name, unsigned n, unsigned elt_size,
> /* calculate mempool object sizes. */
> if (!rte_mempool_calc_obj_size(elt_size, flags, &objsz)) {
> rte_errno = EINVAL;
> - return NULL;
> + goto exit;
> }
>
> rte_mcfg_mempool_write_lock();
> @@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ rte_mempool_create_empty(const char *name, unsigned n, unsigned elt_size,
> te = rte_zmalloc("MEMPOOL_TAILQ_ENTRY", sizeof(*te), 0);
> if (te == NULL) {
> RTE_MEMPOOL_LOG(ERR, "Cannot allocate tailq entry!");
> - goto exit_unlock;
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> mempool_size = RTE_MEMPOOL_HEADER_SIZE(mp, cache_size);
> @@ -887,12 +887,12 @@ rte_mempool_create_empty(const char *name, unsigned n, unsigned elt_size,
> ret = snprintf(mz_name, sizeof(mz_name), RTE_MEMPOOL_MZ_FORMAT, name);
> if (ret < 0 || ret >= (int)sizeof(mz_name)) {
> rte_errno = ENAMETOOLONG;
> - goto exit_unlock;
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> mz = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, mempool_size, socket_id, mz_flags);
> if (mz == NULL)
> - goto exit_unlock;
> + goto unlock;
>
> /* init the mempool structure */
> mp = mz->addr;
> @@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ rte_mempool_create_empty(const char *name, unsigned n, unsigned elt_size,
> ret = strlcpy(mp->name, name, sizeof(mp->name));
> if (ret < 0 || ret >= (int)sizeof(mp->name)) {
> rte_errno = ENAMETOOLONG;
> - goto exit_unlock;
> + goto unlock;
> }
> mp->mz = mz;
> mp->size = n;
> @@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ rte_mempool_create_empty(const char *name, unsigned n, unsigned elt_size,
>
> if (ret) {
> rte_errno = -ret;
> - goto exit_unlock;
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -956,13 +956,16 @@ rte_mempool_create_empty(const char *name, unsigned n, unsigned elt_size,
>
> rte_mempool_trace_create_empty(name, n, elt_size, cache_size,
> private_data_size, flags, mp);
> - return mp;
> + goto exit;
>
> -exit_unlock:
> +unlock:
> rte_mcfg_mempool_write_unlock();
> rte_free(te);
> rte_mempool_free(mp);
> - return NULL;
> + mp = NULL;
> +
> +exit:
> + return mp;
> }
>
> /* create the mempool */
> --
Personally, I don't see much profit in such refactoring.
> 2.30.2
> <
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-07 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-19 17:46 [PATCH 0/2] mempool: add rte_errno, and turn functions into single-exit ones Ariel Otilibili
2025-01-19 17:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] mempool: add rte_errno in rte_mempool_set_ops_byname Ariel Otilibili
2025-01-19 17:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] mempool: turn functions into single-exit ones Ariel Otilibili
2025-01-19 23:44 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-01-20 10:05 ` Ariel Otilibili
2025-01-20 12:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] add rte_errno to rte_mempool_create_empty, and refactor Ariel Otilibili
2025-01-20 12:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mempool: fix rte_errno in rte_mempool_create_empty Ariel Otilibili
2025-01-24 6:47 ` fengchengwen
2025-02-07 14:30 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-01-20 12:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mempool: make rte_mempool_create_empty a single-exit Ariel Otilibili
2025-02-07 14:31 ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0371b52754c44c789fa8b1250bfc023@huawei.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=ariel.otilibili@6wind.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).