From: "Kinsella, Ray" <mdr@ashroe.eu>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] devtools: give some hints for ABI errors
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 14:22:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0f6cf1c-5d72-e807-b7bf-e14597bbec36@ashroe.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8yZwkRnXaCk30P4q-Kuu1kaQoKx8inSsoswCdAtJq90AQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/07/2020 14:15, David Marchand wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 3:09 PM Kinsella, Ray <mdr@ashroe.eu> wrote:
>>
>> + Aaron
>>
>> On 08/07/2020 11:22, David Marchand wrote:
>>> abidiff can provide some more information about the ABI difference it
>>> detected.
>>> In all cases, a discussion on the mailing must happen but we can give
>>> some hints to know if this is a problem with the script calling abidiff,
>>> a potential ABI breakage or an unambiguous ABI breakage.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> devtools/check-abi.sh | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/devtools/check-abi.sh b/devtools/check-abi.sh
>>> index e17fedbd9f..521e2cce7c 100755
>>> --- a/devtools/check-abi.sh
>>> +++ b/devtools/check-abi.sh
>>> @@ -50,10 +50,22 @@ for dump in $(find $refdir -name "*.dump"); do
>>> error=1
>>> continue
>>> fi
>>> - if ! abidiff $ABIDIFF_OPTIONS $dump $dump2; then
>>> + abidiff $ABIDIFF_OPTIONS $dump $dump2 || {
>>> + abiret=$?
>>> echo "Error: ABI issue reported for 'abidiff $ABIDIFF_OPTIONS $dump $dump2'"
>>> error=1
>>> - fi
>>> + echo
>>> + if [ $(($abiret & 3)) != 0 ]; then
>>> + echo "ABIDIFF_ERROR|ABIDIFF_USAGE_ERROR, please report this to dev@dpdk.org."
>
> Forgot to --amend.
> Hopefully yes, this will be reported to dev@dpdk.org... I wanted to
> highlight this could be a script or env issue.
>
>
>>> + fi
>>> + if [ $(($abiret & 4)) != 0 ]; then
>>> + echo "ABIDIFF_ABI_CHANGE, this change requires a review (abidiff flagged this as a potential issue)."
>>> + fi
>>> + if [ $(($abiret & 8)) != 0 ]; then
>>> + echo "ABIDIFF_ABI_INCOMPATIBLE_CHANGE, this change breaks the ABI."
>>> + fi
>>> + echo
>>> + }
>>> done
>>>
>>> [ -z "$error" ] || [ -n "$warnonly" ]
>>>
>>
>> This look good to me, my only thought was can we do anything to help the ABI checks play nice with Travis.
>> At the moment it takes time to find the failure reason in the Travis log.
>
> I usually look for "FILES_TO" to get to the last error.
>
Right, but there is hopefully a better way to give Travis some clues ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-08 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-08 10:22 David Marchand
2020-07-08 13:09 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-07-08 13:15 ` David Marchand
2020-07-08 13:22 ` Kinsella, Ray [this message]
2020-07-08 13:45 ` Aaron Conole
2020-07-08 14:01 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-07-09 15:52 ` Dodji Seketeli
2020-07-10 7:37 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-07-10 10:58 ` Neil Horman
2020-07-15 12:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " David Marchand
2020-07-15 12:48 ` Aaron Conole
2020-07-16 7:29 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0f6cf1c-5d72-e807-b7bf-e14597bbec36@ashroe.eu \
--to=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dodji@redhat.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).