From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62317CE2 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 21:43:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jun 2017 12:43:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,281,1493708400"; d="scan'208";a="269126497" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.81]) ([10.237.220.81]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2017 12:43:52 -0700 To: "Patil, Harish" , "Mody, Rasesh" , "dev@dpdk.org" Cc: Dept-Eng DPDK Dev , Olivier MATZ References: <1495960654-352-1-git-send-email-rasesh.mody@cavium.com> <1495960654-352-7-git-send-email-rasesh.mody@cavium.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 20:43:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] mbuf: introduce new Tx offload flag for MPLS-in-UDP X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 19:43:57 -0000 On 6/1/2017 7:59 PM, Patil, Harish wrote: >> > >> On 5/28/2017 9:37 AM, Rasesh Mody wrote: >>> From: Harish Patil >>> >>> Some PMDs need to know the tunnel type in order to handle advance TX >>> features. This patch adds a new TX offload flag for MPLS-in-UDP packets. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Harish Patil >>> --- >>> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 2 ++ >>> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 17 ++++++++++------- >>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> CC: Olivier MATZ >> >> This patch updates rte_mbuf, so the patchset will wait for the ACK for >> this patch first. >> >> Thanks, >> ferruh >> >> > Hi Ferruh, > Please note that this mbuf change is an independent patch. > Let me know if you want us to provide it as a separate patch. > Only patch 7/7 depends on the mbuf patch. I think it is good idea to make separate patchset, so this won't block all patchset. > > Thanks, > Harish > >