DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>,
	"Nicolau, Radu" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/bonding: fix link status check
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:39:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f53b8d1e-95f7-faee-f4f1-459b6004aac9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <804866d5-8b3a-7992-b15c-7e2f04d4245c@intel.com>

On 6/13/2018 5:10 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 2/12/2018 6:26 PM, Chas Williams wrote:
>> It's not clear to me that link_properties_valid() is even correct.  Nothing
>> prevents an adapter from later negotiating a lower speed and would fail this
>> test.  If both adapters are set to autoneg, that should be sufficient but
>> nothing enforces the speed match after the slaves are configured.  So what is
>> the point of this check?
> 
> Reminder of this patch.
> 
> This is waiting in the backlog for a long time. It is not even clear if the
> patch is still valid or not.
> 
> Also based on missing response to Chas' clarification request, I am for
> dropping/rejecting the patch.
> 
> @Declan, @Radu please chime in if this patch is required/valid.

Marked as rejected.

> 
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net
>> <mailto:thomas@monjalon.net>> wrote:
>>
>>     17/01/2018 17:02, Ferruh Yigit:
>>     > On 11/29/2017 3:42 PM, Tomasz Kulasek wrote:
>>     > > Some devices needs more time to initialize and bring interface up. When
>>     > > link is down the link properties are not valid, e.g. link_speed is
>>     > > reported as 0 and this is not a valid speed for slave as well as for whole
>>     > > bonding.
>>     > >
>>     > > During NIC (and bonding) initialization there's concurrency between
>>     > > updating link status and adding slave to the bonding.
>>     > >
>>     > > This patch:
>>     > >
>>     > >  - adds delay before configuring bonding (if link is down) to be sure that
>>     > >    link status of new slave is valid,
>>     > >  - propagates information about link status from first slave with link up
>>     > >    instead of first slave at all, to be sure that link speed is valid.
>>     > >
>>     > > Fixes: 6abd94d72ab5 ("net/bonding: fix check slaves link properties")
>>     > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com <mailto:tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>>
>>     > > ---
>>     > > v2 changes:
>>     > >  - Checkpatch warnings,
>>     > >  - Improved code style
>>     > Hi Declan,
>>     >
>>     > Any comment on this patch?
>>
>>     Any news?
>>
>>
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-18  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-29 14:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Tomasz Kulasek
2017-11-29 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Tomasz Kulasek
2018-01-17 16:02   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-02-06 20:52     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-02-12 18:26       ` Chas Williams
2018-06-13 16:10         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-06-18  8:39           ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2018-02-16 20:13   ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f53b8d1e-95f7-faee-f4f1-459b6004aac9@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=3chas3@gmail.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).