From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"david.marchand@6wind.com" <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] log: do not drop debug logs at compile time
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 17:02:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6563886-b2f5-112b-2264-0e1a6c2be001@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D9218931-1F74-4467-9C72-D6F989762383@intel.com>
Hi Keith,
On 09/30/2016 05:48 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>> On Sep 30, 2016, at 4:33 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2016-09-16 09:43, Olivier Matz:
>>> Today, all logs whose level is lower than INFO are dropped at
>>> compile-time. This prevents from enabling debug logs at runtime using
>>> --log-level=8.
>>>
>>> The rationale was to remove debug logs from the data path at
>>> compile-time, avoiding a test at run-time.
>>>
>>> This patch changes the behavior of RTE_LOG() to avoid the compile-time
>>> optimization, and introduces the RTE_LOG_DP() macro that has the same
>>> behavior than the previous RTE_LOG(), for the rare cases where debug
>>> logs are in the data path.
>>>
>>> So it is now possible to enable debug logs at run-time by just
>>> specifying --log-level=8. Some drivers still have special compile-time
>>> options to enable more debug log. Maintainers may consider to
>>> remove/reduce them.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
>>
>> I think it is a good change.
>> However I'm not sure we should take it for 16.11 as it was sent late and
>> there is no review comment.
>> It is neither really a fix nor really a feature.
>> If there are some +1, and no opinions against, it will go in 16.11.
>> Note that some drivers would need some changes to fully benefit of
>> debug logs enabled at run-time.
>
> Would this be easier to add a new LOG level instead say DEBUG_DATAPATH and then change the RTE_LOG to exclude the new log level?
>
>
The log levels are quite standard, I don't feel it would be very clear
to have a new level for that. It would also prevent to have different
log level inside data path.
Regards,
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-03 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-16 7:43 Olivier Matz
2016-09-30 9:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-09-30 15:48 ` Wiles, Keith
2016-10-03 15:02 ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2016-10-03 15:27 ` Wiles, Keith
2016-10-03 15:37 ` Olivier Matz
2016-10-03 16:27 ` Wiles, Keith
2016-10-04 8:28 ` David Marchand
2016-10-05 12:01 ` Olivier Matz
2016-10-04 8:26 ` David Marchand
2016-10-05 11:57 ` Olivier Matz
2016-11-23 15:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Olivier Matz
2016-12-05 14:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f6563886-b2f5-112b-2264-0e1a6c2be001@6wind.com \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).