DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"david.marchand@6wind.com" <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] log: do not drop debug logs at compile time
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 17:02:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6563886-b2f5-112b-2264-0e1a6c2be001@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D9218931-1F74-4467-9C72-D6F989762383@intel.com>

Hi Keith,

On 09/30/2016 05:48 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>> On Sep 30, 2016, at 4:33 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2016-09-16 09:43, Olivier Matz:
>>> Today, all logs whose level is lower than INFO are dropped at
>>> compile-time. This prevents from enabling debug logs at runtime using
>>> --log-level=8.
>>>
>>> The rationale was to remove debug logs from the data path at
>>> compile-time, avoiding a test at run-time.
>>>
>>> This patch changes the behavior of RTE_LOG() to avoid the compile-time
>>> optimization, and introduces the RTE_LOG_DP() macro that has the same
>>> behavior than the previous RTE_LOG(), for the rare cases where debug
>>> logs are in the data path.
>>>
>>> So it is now possible to enable debug logs at run-time by just
>>> specifying --log-level=8. Some drivers still have special compile-time
>>> options to enable more debug log. Maintainers may consider to
>>> remove/reduce them.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
>>
>> I think it is a good change.
>> However I'm not sure we should take it for 16.11 as it was sent late and
>> there is no review comment.
>> It is neither really a fix nor really a feature.
>> If there are some +1, and no opinions against, it will go in 16.11.
>> Note that some drivers would need some changes to fully benefit of
>> debug logs enabled at run-time.
> 
> Would this be easier to add a new LOG level instead say DEBUG_DATAPATH and then change the RTE_LOG to exclude the new log level?
> 
> 

The log levels are quite standard, I don't feel it would be very clear
to have a new level for that. It would also prevent to have different
log level inside data path.

Regards,
Olivier

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-03 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-16  7:43 Olivier Matz
2016-09-30  9:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-09-30 15:48   ` Wiles, Keith
2016-10-03 15:02     ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2016-10-03 15:27       ` Wiles, Keith
2016-10-03 15:37         ` Olivier Matz
2016-10-03 16:27           ` Wiles, Keith
2016-10-04  8:28             ` David Marchand
2016-10-05 12:01               ` Olivier Matz
2016-10-04  8:26 ` David Marchand
2016-10-05 11:57   ` Olivier Matz
2016-11-23 15:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Olivier Matz
2016-12-05 14:08   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f6563886-b2f5-112b-2264-0e1a6c2be001@6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).