DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
To: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>, Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 19:34:48 +0000
Message-ID: <f7c40552-8490-14c2-6b11-b8e15088dcd5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201104185858.18397-2-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>



On 04/11/2020 18:58, Dharmik Thakkar wrote:
> Fix incorrect calculations for LPM adds, LPM deletes,
> and average cycles in RCU QSBR perf tests
> 
> Since, rcu qsbr tests run for 'RCU_ITERATIONS' and not
> 'ITERATIONS', replace 'ITERATIONS' with 'RCU_ITERATIONS'
> for calculating adds, deletes, and cycles.
> 
> Also, for multi-writer perf test, each writer only writes
> half of NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES.
> For 2 writers, total adds (or deletes) should be
> (RCU_ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES) instead of
> (2 * RCU_ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES).
> 
> Since, for both the single and multi writer tests, total adds/deletes
> is equal to (RCU_ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES),
> this has been replaced with a macro 'TOTAL_WRITES' and furthermore,
> 'g_writes' has been removed since it is always a fixed value
> equal to TOTAL_WRITES.
> 
> Fixes: eff30b59cc2e ("test/lpm: add RCU performance tests")
> Cc: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> ---
>   app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 45 ++++++++++++++--------------------------
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
> index c5a238b9d1e8..45164b23214b 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ static struct rte_rcu_qsbr *rv;
>   static volatile uint8_t writer_done;
>   static volatile uint32_t thr_id;
>   static uint64_t gwrite_cycles;
> -static uint64_t gwrites;
>   /* LPM APIs are not thread safe, use mutex to provide thread safety */
>   static pthread_mutex_t lpm_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
>   
> @@ -60,6 +59,8 @@ static uint32_t num_ldepth_route_entries;
>   #define NUM_ROUTE_ENTRIES num_route_entries
>   #define NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES num_ldepth_route_entries
>   
> +#define TOTAL_WRITES (RCU_ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES)
> +
>   enum {
>   	IP_CLASS_A,
>   	IP_CLASS_B,
> @@ -432,7 +433,6 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)
>   	uint8_t core_id = (uint8_t)((uintptr_t)arg);
>   	uint32_t next_hop_add = 0xAA;
>   
> -	RTE_SET_USED(arg);
>   	/* 2 writer threads are used */
>   	if (core_id % 2 == 0) {
>   		si = 0;
> @@ -472,9 +472,6 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)
>   	total_cycles = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
>   
>   	__atomic_fetch_add(&gwrite_cycles, total_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> -	__atomic_fetch_add(&gwrites,
> -			2 * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES * RCU_ITERATIONS,
> -			__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -528,7 +525,6 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
>   
>   	writer_done = 0;
>   	__atomic_store_n(&gwrite_cycles, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> -	__atomic_store_n(&gwrites, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>   
>   	__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
>   
> @@ -548,14 +544,11 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
>   		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
>   			goto error;
>   
> -	printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n",
> -		2 * ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
> -	printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n",
> -		2 * ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
> +	printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
> +	printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>   	printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %"PRIu64" cycles\n",
> -		__atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) /
> -			__atomic_load_n(&gwrites, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
> -		);
> +		__atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
> +		/ TOTAL_WRITES);
>   
>   	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
>   	writer_done = 1;
> @@ -581,7 +574,6 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
>   
>   	writer_done = 0;
>   	__atomic_store_n(&gwrite_cycles, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> -	__atomic_store_n(&gwrites, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>   	__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
>   
>   	/* Launch reader threads */
> @@ -600,14 +592,11 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
>   		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
>   			goto error;
>   
> -	printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n",
> -		2 * ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
> -	printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n",
> -		2 * ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
> +	printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
> +	printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>   	printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %"PRIu64" cycles\n",
> -		__atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) /
> -			__atomic_load_n(&gwrites, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
> -		);
> +		__atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
> +		/ TOTAL_WRITES);
>   
>   	writer_done = 1;
>   	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
> @@ -711,11 +700,10 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
>   	}
>   	total_cycles = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
>   
> -	printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
> -	printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n",
> -		ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
> +	printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
> +	printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>   	printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %g cycles\n",
> -		(double)total_cycles / (NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES * ITERATIONS));
> +		(double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
>   
>   	writer_done = 1;
>   	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
> @@ -771,11 +759,10 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
>   	}
>   	total_cycles = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
>   
> -	printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
> -	printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n",
> -		ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
> +	printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
> +	printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
>   	printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %g cycles\n",
> -		(double)total_cycles / (NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES * ITERATIONS));
> +		(double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
>   
>   	writer_done = 1;
>   	/* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
> 

Acked-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>

-- 
Regards,
Vladimir

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-04 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-29 15:36 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-10-29 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-10-29 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-10-29 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 17:17   ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-02 22:11     ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 10:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation " David Marchand
2020-11-02 15:11 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-11-02 16:58   ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 17:21     ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-02 17:33     ` Bruce Richardson
2020-11-02 23:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 23:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  1:30     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-02 23:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  1:28     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  4:42       ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 23:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  1:21     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  4:56       ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 23:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  4:21     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  4:33       ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:32         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03 14:03           ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 14:51             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03 18:01             ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-03  5:12   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:21       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  5:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:22       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  5:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:35         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-04 15:46         ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-04 16:49           ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 18:58       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 18:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 19:34           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir [this message]
2020-11-04 18:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 19:35           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-04 18:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 19:35           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-04 18:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 19:35           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-05 15:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7c40552-8490-14c2-6b11-b8e15088dcd5@intel.com \
    --to=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dharmik.thakkar@arm.com \
    --cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git