DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] bonding: fix overflow check
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:30:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7caf75b-bc86-13ee-9ca3-135be03a2a5d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a93b0d2-5d19-b0fe-e3d3-a47921d96c25@huawei.com>

On 4/30/2021 3:54 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2021/4/29 21:33, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
>> On 4/27/2021 2:40 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>>> Buffer 'test_params->slave_port_ids' of size 6 accessed may
>>> overflow, since its index 'i' can have value be is out of range.
>>>
>>> This patch fixed it.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 92073ef961ee ("bond: unit tests")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>> * fix bonded_slave_count value.
>>> ---
>>>   app/test/test_link_bonding.c | 3 +++
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
>>> index 8a5c831..f8abb22 100644
>>> --- a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
>>> +++ b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
>>> @@ -2216,6 +2216,9 @@ test_activebackup_rx_burst(void)
>>>               "failed to get primary slave for bonded port (%d)",
>>>               test_params->bonded_port_id);
>>>   +    if (test_params->bonded_slave_count > TEST_MAX_NUMBER_OF_PORTS)
>>> +        test_params->bonded_slave_count = TEST_MAX_NUMBER_OF_PORTS;
>>> +
>>
>> Hi Connor,
>>
>> Similar comment as previous version, what is the root cause, how
>> 'bonded_slave_count' end up being bigger than 'TEST_MAX_NUMBER_OF_PORTS'?
>>
> Hi Ferruh,
> Currently, it will not happen.
> But if the testcase extended, for instance,
> "test_add_slave_to_bonded_device" is called over
> TEST_MAX_NUMBER_OF_PORTS(6) times in
> "test_add_already_bonded_slave_to_bonded_device",
> then 'bonded_slave_count' will be bigger than
> 'TEST_MAX_NUMBER_OF_PORTS'.
> 

What do you think adding 'test_params->bonded_slave_count' check at the
beginning of the 'test_add_slave_to_bonded_device()' and fail test case if it is
bigger than 'TEST_MAX_NUMBER_OF_PORTS'?

>>>       for (i = 0; i < test_params->bonded_slave_count; i++) {
>>>           /* Generate test bursts of packets to transmit */
>>>           TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(generate_test_burst(
>>>
>>
>> .
>>


      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-30  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-22  9:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-26 15:08 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-27  1:41   ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-27  1:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-29 13:33   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-30  2:54     ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-30  9:30       ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7caf75b-bc86-13ee-9ca3-135be03a2a5d@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=humin29@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).