From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3179A04B5; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:05:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99DF140CDB; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:05:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B2D140CCA for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:05:13 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610370312; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NvE0uEKtQnko53b5JWuSLSQsrJSpjnqkPE7DMnAj+ck=; b=CmOSVIqd+K6WH66gG+KRaf4ckB3l/snf1eY9uAB2JJgPtaPubWTy+YGdb0MOkCVU9K7agg CiURCTLQ29rrZc/mlhtQfUevdcRDz0u3+KftTrgpN4c09S2VVoVi/THz8AV6Maq8PD8Jy3 QDoxsjh9J1F7OoK4Z7liKfdunZK1Kuc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-584-5w6NcbXFNsK_uc11ax6v9Q-1; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:05:09 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 5w6NcbXFNsK_uc11ax6v9Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDB70192D786; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-113-60.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.113.60]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA76660C62; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:05:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, Joyce Kong <Joyce.Kong@arm.com>, "maxime.coquelin\@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>, "chenbo.xia\@intel.com" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>, "jerinj\@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>, Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>, "dev\@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, "thomas\@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>, "dpdklab\@iol.unh.edu" <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>, "Chen\, Zhaoyan" <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com> References: <20200911120906.45995-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> <20201117100635.27690-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> <20201117100635.27690-3-joyce.kong@arm.com> <daf6e33c-84fe-68ed-ee3e-bb494383a650@intel.com> <DBAPR08MB5814F4E1B149BAB0403140D898AE0@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:05:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <DBAPR08MB5814F4E1B149BAB0403140D898AE0@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (Honnappa Nagarahalli's message of "Fri, 8 Jan 2021 22:26:13 +0000") Message-ID: <f7t1rer8w03.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/4] net/virtio: add vectorized packed ring Rx NEON path X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> writes: > <snip> > >> >> On 11/17/2020 10:06 AM, Joyce Kong wrote: >> > + /** >> > + * Update data length and packet length for descriptor. >> > + * structure of pkt_mb: >> > + * -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > + * |32 bits pkt_type|32 bits pkt_len|16 bits data_len|16 bits >> vlan_tci| >> > + * -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > + */ >> > + pkt_mb[0] = vreinterpretq_u64_u8(vqtbl1q_u8( >> > + vreinterpretq_u8_u64(desc[0]), shuf_msk1)); >> > + pkt_mb[1] = vreinterpretq_u64_u8(vqtbl1q_u8( >> > + vreinterpretq_u8_u64(desc[0]), shuf_msk2)); >> > + pkt_mb[2] = vreinterpretq_u64_u8(vqtbl1q_u8( >> > + vreinterpretq_u8_u64(desc[1]), shuf_msk1))' >> >> s\'\; >> >> I will fix in next-net but my concern is why this has been not caught by any of >> our automated builds? >> >> In patchwork only test report seems from the 'checkpatch': >> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/84260/ > > Looking at [1], Travis CI has not run and the UNH CI did not have Arm > builds enabled at the time this patch was submitted. Seem my other email. Travis CI doesn't run 'patch-at-a-time' for execution time reasons. > [1] https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/84262/