From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04DAA0588; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:07:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB251D91A; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:07:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C641D906 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:07:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1587056872; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zsrQcOADjoIlQs2dl/i0P4N/6j+d02K2KPmj0+sl38E=; b=eLbB66x2o1n3YZ0co+PfZSbAU7GuX+zRBQtFePpq3w5Blgb4UKufvlHs0OH9VwFVr+kRU9 vEkSBInEYt0GMKheHCvSBPiAhlDGR6/jvMe5ZAejSh6C45PvP7T3WE8cYmKPMx+u0z5xvg EWl7ascOoG7n21QDvDgJMIoJyCO9tbI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-138-wdT7hIeVMveJToCcOrq1VA-1; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:07:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wdT7hIeVMveJToCcOrq1VA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E5E78017F6; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-116-136.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.136]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E30995C28E; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:07:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: David Marchand , dev , "Ruifeng Wang \(Arm Technology China\)" , Gavin Hu , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Michael Santana References: <20200416110053.2547791-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <4760008.eFTFzoEnKi@thomas> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:07:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4760008.eFTFzoEnKi@thomas> (Thomas Monjalon's message of "Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:39:56 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: remove aarch64 from Travis jobs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Thomas Monjalon writes: > 16/04/2020 15:45, Aaron Conole: >> David Marchand writes: >> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 2:44 PM Aaron Conole wrot= e: >> >> Thomas Monjalon writes: >> >> >> >> > Travis is not reliable for native Arm and PPC: >> >> > https://travis-ci.community/t/disk-quota-exceeded-on-arm64/7619/6 >> >> > >> >> > In order to get reliable Travis reports, >> >> > the use of Arm machines is removed until Travis fixes it. >> >> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon >> >> > --- >> >> >> >> We should add back the cross-build if we do this - at least then we >> >> could have a reliable compilation test of Arm64 code. Does it make >> >> sense? >> > >> > I don't see them removed by this patch, the two jobs are still present= ? >>=20 >> Whoops - for some reason I missed them. Nevermind :) > > So? Acked? Yes, Acked-by: Aaron Conole