From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: Michael Santana Francisco <msantana@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, David Marchand <dmarchan@redhat.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ci: enable unit tests under travis-ci
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 09:34:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7ta7cr7ksp.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABzctQ9i9xrG-w4nKefoqbPvOhiO+CWAuHs6njSph-EhwixU4w@mail.gmail.com> (Michael Santana Francisco's message of "Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:54:46 -0400")
Michael Santana Francisco <msantana@redhat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:50 AM Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> When building under Travis (or another linux CI service), enable running the
>> fast-tests for selected builds. Only the shared builds are enabled at this
>> point, since they are the ones passing. Builds that are statically linked
>> still show some issues in some of the eal_flags tests. Additionally,
>> the command to invoke fast tests includes a timeout multiplier, since
>> some CI environments don't have enough resources to complete the tests in
>> the default 10s timeout period.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> .ci/linux-build.sh | 8 ++++++++
>> .ci/linux-setup.sh | 8 +++++++-
>> .travis.yml | 9 ++++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/.ci/linux-build.sh b/.ci/linux-build.sh
>> index d5783c1a4..75f740648 100755
>> --- a/.ci/linux-build.sh
>> +++ b/.ci/linux-build.sh
>> @@ -22,3 +22,11 @@ fi
>> OPTS="$OPTS --default-library=$DEF_LIB"
>> meson build --werror -Dexamples=all $OPTS
>> ninja -C build
>> +
>> +if [ "$RUN_TESTS" = "1" ]; then
>> + # On the test build, also build the documentation, since it's expensive
>> + # and we shouldn't need to build so much of it.
>> + ninja -C build doc
>> +
>> + sudo meson test -C build --suite fast-tests -t 3
>> +fi
>> diff --git a/.ci/linux-setup.sh b/.ci/linux-setup.sh
>> index acdf9f370..a40e62eaa 100755
>> --- a/.ci/linux-setup.sh
>> +++ b/.ci/linux-setup.sh
>> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
>> #!/bin/sh
>>
>> -python3 -m pip install --upgrade meson --user
>> +# need to install as 'root' since some of the unit tests won't run without it
>> +sudo python3 -m pip install --upgrade meson
>> +
>> +# setup hugepages
>> +cat /proc/meminfo
>> +sudo sh -c 'echo 1024 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages'
>> +cat /proc/meminfo
> Can we drop cat /proc/meminfo?
>> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
>> index 7b167fa64..c0c27bb7f 100644
>> --- a/.travis.yml
>> +++ b/.travis.yml
>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ env:
>> - DEF_LIB="shared"
>> - DEF_LIB="static" OPTS="-Denable_kmods=false"
>> - DEF_LIB="shared" OPTS="-Denable_kmods=false"
>> + - DEF_LIB="shared" RUN_TESTS=1
> I don't agree with this. This is redundant. Why not put RUN_TESTS=1 on
> an already exiting builds instead of adding two new builds like you
> are doing here?
> A build without the tests takes ~7 minutes, with the tests it
> increases to ~9 minutes. These two new builds add ~18 minutes of build
> time to the entire travis build time. We could use this ~18 minutes
> instead to run the tests on 6 to 9 already existing builds since they
> take 2 to 3 extra minutes on each one.
Hi Michael,
The ovsrobot was off for a bit due to an internal issue. Now that it's
back, a new build was generated. Please have a look. The time delta is
about 8-12 minutes (because builds are in parallel) for a complete run
(that's with all of the various jobs which make up a build).
Do you think it's unreasonable?
-Aaron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-02 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-31 14:50 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Enable fast-unit tests under travis Aaron Conole
2019-07-31 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] tests: Fix unit tests for shared builds Aaron Conole
2019-07-31 15:36 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-07-31 16:07 ` Aaron Conole
2019-07-31 16:10 ` Aaron Conole
2019-08-01 9:19 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-08-01 15:40 ` Aaron Conole
2019-08-01 16:51 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-08-01 16:52 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-08-02 20:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-08-02 20:43 ` Aaron Conole
2019-07-31 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ci: enable unit tests under travis-ci Aaron Conole
2019-07-31 20:54 ` Michael Santana Francisco
2019-08-02 13:34 ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2019-08-02 13:40 ` Michael Santana Francisco
2019-08-02 20:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-08-02 20:59 ` Aaron Conole
2019-08-02 21:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-08-02 21:07 ` Aaron Conole
2019-08-02 14:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Enable fast-unit tests under travis David Marchand
2019-08-02 21:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Aaron Conole
2019-08-02 21:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] tests: Fix unit tests for shared builds Aaron Conole
2019-08-02 21:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-08-02 21:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] ci: enable unit tests under travis-ci Aaron Conole
2019-08-02 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Enable fast-unit tests under travis Thomas Monjalon
2019-08-05 6:26 ` David Marchand
2019-08-05 12:52 ` David Marchand
2019-08-05 13:56 ` Michael Santana Francisco
2019-08-05 14:18 ` Aaron Conole
2019-08-05 14:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-08-07 14:06 ` Michael Santana Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7ta7cr7ksp.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=msantana@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).