From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: "Zawadzki\, Tomasz" <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Cc: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>,
Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>,
"dpdklab\@iol.unh.edu" <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>,
"ci\@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>, "dev\@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"spdk\@lists.01.org" <spdk@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 10:13:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7th7ml5l6o.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB422097059AB558056B97BEC5EE8F9@DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (Tomasz Zawadzki's message of "Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:17:34 +0000")
"Zawadzki, Tomasz" <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> writes:
> Hi Lincoln,
>
>
>
> That patch in question is now merged to branch v21.01.x.
>
Good to know - I do still see a failure in the IOL job (even from a few
hours ago). I suppose the lab side might need some adjustment, too?
>
> The builds performed for latest SPDK and SPDK LTS, against dpdk-main branch seem to be passing. Would love to hear if
> this is what you are seeing on your end too.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tomek
>
>
>
> From: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 5:21 PM
> To: Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
> Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>; Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org;
> dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab
>
>
>
> Thanks Tomek,
>
>
>
> Can you let us know when the merge happens and we'll make sure the next set of builds pass or see what the next failure
> is. :-P
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Lincoln
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:03 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Thank you for reporting this !
>
> This is an issue with rte_power now depending on rte_ethdev, which was resolved on latest SPDK.
>
> I believe that UNH lab verifies DPDK patches against SPDK branch for latest release. Which after the very recent SPDK
> release, would be v21.01.x:
> https://github.com/spdk/spdk/tree/v21.01.x
>
> The fix has been backported to that branch and should be merged shortly:
> https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6320
>
> Thanks,
> Tomek
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Aaron Conole
> > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 4:21 PM
> > To: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>
> > Cc: dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I've noticed that recently SPDK compilation in the UNH community lab seems
> > to be failing, and I don't see an obvious reason for the failure.
> > The logs haven't been too helpful - it appears that there is a symbol that isn't
> > available when linking.
> >
> > Job details (for example):
> > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/results/results-
> > uploads/test_runs/2363efb43157465db3228c34c00ebd57/log_upload_file/20
> > 21/2/dpdk_f6f2d2240153_15524_2021-02-04_22-59-59_NA.zip
> >
> > Is it possible to turn on more verbose logging during the compilation of
> > SPDK? Maybe show the arguments to the compiler for the specific object?
> > Maybe the SPDK folks can see something obviously wrong?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Aaron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-09 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 15:21 [dpdk-dev] " Aaron Conole
2021-02-08 16:03 ` Zawadzki, Tomasz
2021-02-08 16:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] " Lincoln Lavoie
[not found] ` <DM6PR11MB422097059AB558056B97BEC5EE8F9@DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2021-02-09 15:13 ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2021-02-09 16:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] " Brandon Lo
2021-02-09 17:54 ` Brandon Lo
2021-02-11 14:02 ` Aaron Conole
2021-02-11 16:25 ` Brandon Lo
2021-02-12 9:18 ` Zawadzki, Tomasz
2021-02-12 17:39 ` Brandon Lo
2021-02-15 15:28 ` Aaron Conole
2021-02-17 16:06 ` Zawadzki, Tomasz
2021-02-18 13:58 ` Brandon Lo
2021-02-15 9:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [SPDK] " David Marchand
2021-02-15 9:56 ` Nick Connolly
2021-02-15 10:15 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7th7ml5l6o.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=blo@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dpdklab@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=spdk@lists.01.org \
--cc=tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).