From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01938A0A03; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:29:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DC5140EAA; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:29:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFA9140E9A for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:29:12 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610976551; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=izJ38fG2gFOwLEYLPz3jITO+r6uE6Ryp1Llg881Huiw=; b=TAbyboRUh7ZaUqlp+pYS64MTfFVnmrDn/8FgP/QMMy/XbpDzyZ2ho0tXaZ71XCTtPLQeXL EcZ3ckW4D0/ff9MsGu2iAwpRxB7yt7e19qVW5ZLEs+9Es1XFbVQU3tfb6BBSweDGm7keZl GEm4lKFCjstd6Xvse9yKZC1ZgwOkThU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-517-CmpyjBLYPfOh1_IOoDEWgA-1; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 08:29:08 -0500 X-MC-Unique: CmpyjBLYPfOh1_IOoDEWgA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0657B801817; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-114-243.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.114.243]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EE8760BFA; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:29:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, joyce.kong@arm.com References: <20210114165855.31863-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <8253139.bqY7tb8vIG@thomas> <20210117101124.651e401c@hermes.local> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 08:29:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20210117101124.651e401c@hermes.local> (Stephen Hemminger's message of "Sun, 17 Jan 2021 10:11:24 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: add missing ticketlock test to fast tests X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Stephen Hemminger writes: > On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 18:57:56 +0100 > Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >> 14/01/2021 17:58, Stephen Hemminger: >> > The ticketlock test is fast and should be run all the time. >> >> I think it was not added because it includes a perf test. >> Cc'ing more people for comments. >> >> > > Other lock code (rwlock is very similar and in the fast tests). I agree, it should be included. I did some digging and seems it wasn't ever part of this set of lists, but could have been all along. As for execution time, here's a run from the 0-day bot: https://github.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/actions/runs/486047432 17m seems to be in the normal range. Acked-by: Aaron Conole Thanks, Stephen!